From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50849: 28.0.50; Proposal for Emacs daemon to signal when being busy Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2022 08:40:16 -0700 Message-ID: References: <86czouksh2.fsf@protected.rcdrun.com> <83mtnykpij.fsf@gnu.org> <87tui5fdku.fsf@gnus.org> <83y27hjhy2.fsf@gnu.org> <87r10uvxr9.fsf@gnus.org> <83o7vyowcl.fsf@gnu.org> <87czceufj1.fsf@gnus.org> <83ilm6osqz.fsf@gnu.org> <87sflaszct.fsf@gnus.org> <874jxpevb6.fsf@gmail.com> <838rn1q3g9.fsf@gnu.org> <87edwsiy9p.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26252"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Visuwesh , bugs@gnu.support, 50849@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 03 17:41:11 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oUVGh-0006e8-HP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 17:41:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49382 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUVGf-0008Sa-WA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 11:41:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60094) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUVGY-0008Rf-HK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 11:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53963) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUVGY-0004Qi-8F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 11:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oUVGX-0000Ql-Uv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 11:41:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2022 15:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50849 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50849-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50849.16622196251594 (code B ref 50849); Sat, 03 Sep 2022 15:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50849) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Sep 2022 15:40:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42662 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oUVFw-0000Pd-KX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 11:40:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ot1-f52.google.com ([209.85.210.52]:43596) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oUVFu-0000PJ-V5 for 50849@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 11:40:23 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ot1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 92-20020a9d0be5000000b0063946111607so3429418oth.10 for <50849@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 08:40:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=LDaaQKuAnI9sOSkByQf2hkf2dyalDcJh0x2UGiLDUDE=; b=mnfq1k0o0XTHnVTXOo8x6VmSJe1jjuy8BbnnUaMMTzrWlQHUihx5XpJeDQyjqj7XLd P1TynvqVj+UNOpZ0ixGZtcifOXAMkzRsu6NsDcdGaaNQrTVNjVmv9d6WsUS10I2/iW4a oVuu2cUreTlKLisW4b260am9LLRPhtN3JyOjoHBnRbtcgz28/Gu6l7FigFwvAjf6iITj qJN3tPtQhpSAbpZi5fjXNn2oAQO1b31WsnVDpB5wU/n/3opyqIy8CLqX4lY3HYN3Xm69 DkKL3XgJCDvv2ly9+DN94wRkc3TDZqBngqe0mS4Z2mxR5A9OEwqAPE2XJBgLJTatjjhN RS7A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=LDaaQKuAnI9sOSkByQf2hkf2dyalDcJh0x2UGiLDUDE=; b=FY+fv54asnjI2HUtCzAT4XzmaChGVPdm12+rWw26+VFXQXZrkZBLlEaWWBQ7NovE83 VVlqRwDo3LEj5PjDkrRklyWt2+iNKgQLC7wX1L62bQ8enYmoRbKwTj0l81YYix74NR69 TiUFe0TyO3L7SpidvKoHD3WcasU+laNRKpWuBGDa3OqlI1CeKimfPboQumUu0XG2LOAs 73CWkZFmK9+U5LhExOAXFnHph5t3jSJ7q2aOCsHfQOBRZUQLzQXzjNWdue34h9Lt2S0M 3uTappElrOCRsL9FJT81VzP+0/TnD2PNY6H1fOJdLRIq1oO+xDZlCyye3QRCXCtj4jq4 4Ytw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo277iu3hohwvNqn9z8iwVfXPC6ojDN1QE6Me9YyNAMwlC8k6sgS PAvXXLNQlJwwYVJLDoX1gMhefYILaTq6EzoiBDA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4xkKM6QofnQh+W7hrBDh+W3Q8qU0KioNQsOUXds3VuLpS/tJa131w/jZMbZhZQ0iTe+uszqEI7F9C0FxjJKjU= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:f05:0:b0:637:1068:1081 with SMTP id 5-20020a9d0f05000000b0063710681081mr15557577ott.224.1662219617452; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 08:40:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sat, 3 Sep 2022 08:40:16 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87edwsiy9p.fsf@gnus.org> X-Hashcash: 1:20:220903:bugs@gnu.support::YAS81l948/wnoQvR:7O6I X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:241423 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >> No, because this will change a long-standing behavior (of waiting >> indefinitely). But we can add a new flag --timeout=NNN to let people >> specify a timeout if they want. Hmm, is that so bad though? I'm not sure I see what problem it could cause. Do people actually want and rely on the indefinite waiting? > I don't think a --timeout parameter will be useful here, though -- > nobody is going to type "emacsclient --timeout 10 -nw". I often do things like alias emacsclient="emacsclient --timeout 10" so I think such a flag would still be useful.