From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61394: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Image-dired thumb name based on content Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 03:02:25 +0000 Message-ID: References: <874jruy7xx.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <87ttztk0yw.fsf@tcd.ie> <87v8k9s6j9.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83ilg8jzti.fsf@gnu.org> <87k00oo03r.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <838rh4jlsq.fsf@gnu.org> <87bklzol8n.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19708"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: contovob@tcd.ie, 61394@debbugs.gnu.org To: Manuel Giraud , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 12 04:03:19 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pR2e7-00051d-9C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2023 04:03:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pR2ds-0000nm-Ki; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 22:03:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pR2dr-0000nQ-7d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 22:03:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pR2dq-00068O-Fn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 22:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pR2dq-00071b-8k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 22:03:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 03:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61394 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 61394-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61394.167617095726970 (code B ref 61394); Sun, 12 Feb 2023 03:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61394) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2023 03:02:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43684 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pR2dQ-00070w-Qu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 22:02:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-oi1-f176.google.com ([209.85.167.176]:40725) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pR2dL-00070g-Eg for 61394@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 22:02:34 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-oi1-f176.google.com with SMTP id n132so7700348oih.7 for <61394@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 19:02:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=t6zS3lPON8mud2BPv4cdksXTPlaRO35RSZxLAvWtrXg=; b=a7n1aJm7V/6CsG32zWCItfEVdSP1AHmiluLeSeNQJPa8MUeARU6LrhdYb31qztEVZe I/dxVjm3v+uXwt/pP12V6OE1XYE9EQv2+WIhldP/iet2VGmLgTylHly9RUHWZxcGIp0U 4oyZQQt96uDxHaVlqHcyrqe4qRG1Td/eUFq04++KesBdfh5DpPOOL00M1icKcMKLgDjU q6GkG0aNCDBA9LZye4WHvDu5mzL3yGDzALT4mGS4gV9smc6+Y4S3btksvvMQoS54pqID z01UF0waroYt2C7daf3/nu4NY5AkHTkdSIzH/VcxZvWyqKWRdbkSzVW6yF6I2HESY97W BWoA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=t6zS3lPON8mud2BPv4cdksXTPlaRO35RSZxLAvWtrXg=; b=dfy7EXWzH73MQvFqElItzYxmWvsVUrFtIYi8I/VRoGqCjTMxroYcCVFWcy1gATLBAZ vDvVu9IpXdhvml/98eXyYsEW1AVHS+BEBPOIAGJ+p7c5X8ZSEzx4Zh1BWP4oXZUcCCYZ XTuVpIWVhRPHAdGYolGfMb1jMHJGKdRwndsP5oQfQEYfulRY4fuzvaSL0vwVzvXgQqhR d+BN07MKU5JluUh1D9UuJNmg/UWoqLEGI9urAx6gNbdlyvjC564L7mWWvzwg2TZUHMpk tOF8qwMKpC4RKCimLE4cYWaewAJVfnm3qLLjU7zatZo30n+JVfvnESk7KYNIXdlBc3UE YBGg== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWSbKxM6n0ACMvIf+fp53xUgVE9eNUoV6eBx2pBIEQZKcJVPjIm wRhqfdwzAZSVBYT2Wm5V3sYVrV7qcNbH8a0APpw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8mLRN9j1JUcd0JxM82JTWDsoTWxDjC4lHdqsac+J0bAM2vFAXtifvNUjlaQklxYUGtk2SgrB7wYgo2kC1iCm0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:2116:b0:360:ceaa:7e4e with SMTP id r22-20020a056808211600b00360ceaa7e4emr1302716oiw.199.1676170945911; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 19:02:25 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 12 Feb 2023 03:02:25 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87bklzol8n.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> X-Hashcash: 1:20:230212:61394@debbugs.gnu.org::RYWW6yZySEx8zfSy:7b5I X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:255365 Archived-At: Manuel Giraud via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" writes: > So, here is another version of the patch. What is the performance impact of this? Could we see some benchmarks? I routinely open folders with hundreds of files that are several megabytes each, so I think this is the type of benchmark I would be interested in. This is common when working with images from a digital camera. If it has too much of a performance impact, we could consider making it optional (and disable it by default).