From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Josh Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23425: master branch: `message' wrongly corrupts ' to curly quote. Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 10:37:33 -0700 Message-ID: References: <7e599cf6-18c3-1633-33d5-e9f4eaa8fe6a@cs.ucla.edu> <20160502191031.GB2048@acm.fritz.box> <83a8k7kv87.fsf@gnu.org> <20160503162716.GB11330@acm.fritz.box> <831t5jkrn2.fsf@gnu.org> <20160503200330.GC11330@acm.fritz.box> <83twidj0tj.fsf@gnu.org> <20160504164849.GA31717@acm.fritz.box> <83d1p1iwls.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: josh+gnu@nispio.net NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462383526 10063 80.91.229.3 (4 May 2016 17:38:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 17:38:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Alan Mackenzie , eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 23425@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 04 19:38:35 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ay0kt-0006Sq-3K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 May 2016 19:38:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49405 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ay0km-0006xy-A5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 May 2016 13:38:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57837) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ay0kb-0006gt-Pd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2016 13:38:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ay0kQ-000686-4x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2016 13:38:12 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54006) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ay0kO-00067I-VJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2016 13:38:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ay0kL-0004SH-Jm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2016 13:38:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Josh Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 17:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23425 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23425-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23425.146238346117100 (code B ref 23425); Wed, 04 May 2016 17:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23425) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2016 17:37:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38110 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ay0k1-0004Rk-A2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2016 13:37:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-f176.google.com ([209.85.161.176]:33237) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ay0jy-0004RU-VV for 23425@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2016 13:37:39 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yw0-f176.google.com with SMTP id t10so108261934ywa.0 for <23425@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 04 May 2016 10:37:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nispio-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc; bh=ix/sDRW8HT5yCnegDXxa4Ro5hsbUhPLp6gXswhTe1e0=; b=eQLAG6gIpv7gCnPfPMa3LGQlKm1Cke82LhUXySLRSYOI0vanDHdeyFTQsjBxE0Y9VC XU8KPSvciPSqpxpGNry9FRtCCXDkOPpgGLHphkEdsQ+qfNvxZi+cEhDAXZzMxHm2G3xg Ci2IHZ/QcSXOb+PApeb9wYYiWNBBX/fGaLbBWWyKM/wQjJpxYMoRuyZ1wz2PrdPdf8bL F3KdJDBdSjMri0QfNBWkR/KMZt6whgnF+hHIrVn31X6vHLg/RimdGkK5enwrWDA2oQPL nHnI5oBg1miUvvq6+HMV4taIP/T0TPil70rSI7ewBYRJDAeoUURFnA73GsCrPDrPfbPE 6I+A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=ix/sDRW8HT5yCnegDXxa4Ro5hsbUhPLp6gXswhTe1e0=; b=GTSaMRauwli/tY6omNCkyhh74vISDxYS2T9eWAN2m3K6FtiMmRsHCJURY3Gys7GjMn ehJNrMPxo/R6Bo3/+citMvm8Bjka9dnyadY8XLEWQ3dHkUHeD3LSXz7et27xohmZlBPs b63JBxN3Zc2W9y/tibbJcXaQ+UtYWotCF/4DGWN0h7eDHaZNrmGchZI71kDAk40I/ZLL X+scOnYO00hi6qtgQY/776d26WjM855mNkvVi76jssRmdERDCrtatAAJmmHnRTccaNgW Aoq0j5Yu2BxYD75V0l6fpTEfGKXUzcf/SiOoVwWju1CoxpJSpMK/ryMjIv/RdOeG/mG7 84eA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUNgZB+KF2re5YmN3elM5dRg1AxYK1LcY5rsybxqbBf5/QB+dj2hfFSFRAyN0opOVg/MOl88ZlGx0WuFQ== X-Received: by 10.129.80.11 with SMTP id e11mr6555422ywb.197.1462383453174; Wed, 04 May 2016 10:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.13.216.130 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2016 10:37:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [67.128.198.190] In-Reply-To: <83d1p1iwls.fsf@gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: WDeYfu-n55RSUfrfylCYIB6M-P4 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:117778 Archived-At: On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> > > That theory _is_ wrong, certainly amongst Emacs developers. Even in this >> > > bug thread, two other people have expressed negative sentiments about >> > > this matter. >> >> > So we have 3 people against that. Is it really enough? >> >> That's three people in this thread. Over the months, more people have >> expressed unhappinness about curly quotes, in the various ways they have >> been imposed on us. Yes, I think that is enough. > > I don't. Please let's wait until 25.1 is released, the only way to > change this decision is if we see a lot of complaints about this. And how do you expect to receive that feedback? Through bug reports? Can I file mine now instead of waiting for the release of 25.1?