From: Allen Li <darkfeline@felesatra.moe>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>,
45607@debbugs.gnu.org, Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>
Subject: bug#45607: 27.1; compiled replace-string breaks repeat-complex-command
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 01:39:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADbSrJy9QUJZNFGAij1d3Cjbp0muqn3Nf38T=6yK+NnJbXgGng@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83pmjk5miq.fsf@gnu.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 737 bytes --]
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 11:58 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> > Cc: 45607@debbugs.gnu.org, Allen Li <darkfeline@felesatra.moe>
> > From: Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>
> > Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 21:40:58 +0300
> >
> > > Does anybody know of a more general solution to this?
> >
> > This feature is broken by design as I explained in
> > https://debbugs.gnu.org/45617#17
>
> It isn't broken, you just expect it to do some magic that it never
> meant to do.
>
> As in many other cases, the perfect is the enemy of the good here.
>
I think it's reasonable to consider the different behavior of evaled vs
compiled to be a bug. Which one is correct can be debated, but the fact
that they're different is a bug. Would you disagree?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1277 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-09 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-02 9:04 bug#45607: 27.1; compiled replace-string breaks repeat-complex-command Allen Li
2022-06-07 12:38 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-06-07 18:40 ` Juri Linkov
2022-06-07 18:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-06-09 8:39 ` Allen Li [this message]
2022-06-09 9:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-06-08 12:05 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-06-09 18:52 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-06-09 18:56 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-06-09 20:51 ` Drew Adams
2022-07-05 14:41 ` Michael Heerdegen
2022-07-05 16:45 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-07-05 18:47 ` Michael Heerdegen
2022-07-06 7:53 ` Juri Linkov
2022-07-06 11:35 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-07-06 18:39 ` Juri Linkov
2022-07-07 8:02 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-08-08 13:53 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-08-08 17:07 ` Juri Linkov
2022-08-09 15:00 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-08-09 18:41 ` Juri Linkov
2022-08-09 18:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-08-09 19:15 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-08-09 19:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-08-09 19:30 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-08-09 19:14 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-08-09 19:30 ` Juri Linkov
2022-08-12 13:01 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-08-12 17:39 ` Juri Linkov
2022-08-13 11:46 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-08-13 19:30 ` Juri Linkov
2022-08-15 6:37 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-09-04 16:57 ` Juri Linkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CADbSrJy9QUJZNFGAij1d3Cjbp0muqn3Nf38T=6yK+NnJbXgGng@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=darkfeline@felesatra.moe \
--cc=45607@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=juri@linkov.net \
--cc=larsi@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).