I stand corrected. Indeed, what I said before only applies to a noncharacter context. On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Glenn Morris wrote: > Raul Laasner wrote: > > > I don't think the standard requires the second '&', although it is > > recommended. > > By my reading, it does require it. > Quoting from FCD 1539-1: > > 3.3.2.4 Free form statement continuation: > > [...] > > If a character context is to be continued, an "&" shall be the last > nonblank character on the line and shall not be followed by commentary. > There shall be a later line that is not a comment; an "&" shall be the > first nonblank character on the next such line and the statement > continues with the next character following that "&". > > Maybe it has changed in newer version of the standard. > -- Raul Laasner Institute of Physics University of Tartu Ravila 14c, 50411, Estonia e-mail: raullaasner@gmail.com cell: (+372)5182268