From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Fussner via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44794: 28.0.50; Frame creation broken with (tool-bar-mode -1) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 18:19:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: <838satxufx.fsf@gnu.org> <83o8jpw813.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfetw4bf.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuspczbw.fsf@gnu.org> <83zh2at6up.fsf@gnu.org> <83pn36szfp.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: David Fussner Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16151"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Stefan Kangas , "J. Scott Berg" , 44794@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 19 19:23:22 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kqgsz-00043K-Kd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 19:23:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34668 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kqgsy-00030Y-Jw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 13:23:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58762) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kqgsg-000306-Nf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 13:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kqgsg-0000rs-8c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 13:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqgsg-0001FI-3k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 13:23:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: David Fussner Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 18:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44794 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44794-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44794.16084021284711 (code B ref 44794); Sat, 19 Dec 2020 18:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44794) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2020 18:22:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43137 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqgrn-0001Dv-PJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 13:22:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qk1-f174.google.com ([209.85.222.174]:43421) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqgrl-0001DS-J4 for 44794@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 13:22:06 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qk1-f174.google.com with SMTP id 143so5275872qke.10 for <44794@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 10:22:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9b/R8jKNedl64vaItI2Ox52uD2QxiwL2vcD8WwE3hTM=; b=HeZeWR58ziIBoGRgR8pRHEkhYCme5oe0W0VPsZHdZ3OXs+aI3Tj5SpKULvrpQZxzFG eVXfGF+yTIdLmOhS99X/sEnLvWftCq+bIh979t0P7ek+MgJ+XMZBc/DfL1SLfacuXL9R JHox49GjnsQv+gmDnsUoH8xeedbKGWhjImZpMRS5hAlQYcdJ9EFzrj5WLOV/d57NS6uO e/UN+EDSs//srcSaAYDbh1u6KvOcfuvWAGitAQSRIZEtD/VjjTfqlDBugz4lb6NsLM/P e6gYfngMJCf+S5A5rM0773zP5AHExp01E9hNUF2iytYtMMT8tDriRLrWrk7AaZU3mF/s PE0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9b/R8jKNedl64vaItI2Ox52uD2QxiwL2vcD8WwE3hTM=; b=uFHQuOlIwIcmA8+bLL6i41MeN53VdXjQJZgHF265oJUEQuknA+QuURVJW5Q6aL5SUR EddjGyxwPk5VxL+0Q8MRCCTTEtVqwy/ceQvPJKdPp/mC0Eo3fSYmpDaR5Cj1wVkHCMIU zwFVoCME8zbK3u1w3PZTwVOG7P2/Zc0VDQQPHLN5tJa4E3FkgKv7PfYkbBOe2K3ZFMgc Lt+D2dsSa4J1pBYY8I59FmsEcDRmDv/ID9ItA2SqX+D2GB/lDqrYz5hz0IxusWclFY4q 2Oj7iiENYiC2F6/oaegojAHAo3VOSB5spDZuCFJkKQ8SbvmJ0XYzhgDBNS8Pu1VrTs8X tQHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Z00NI3r8Jt2qVIV5b/22beDLAn9EKsXszGQbzetZwTXEBrqCU Bnt0GJj7RXjuaQEWRYQej5kPfwUpRXHG2IQ0isE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwGkKtj0FR8tDopBeQym055vCYtu46GwQZwmXeF1noQWqY7japVD2OXq0IT2udPuH4z+UKi1PTSy+R2mFY3hnQ= X-Received: by 2002:a37:64c3:: with SMTP id y186mr11006543qkb.118.1608402120142; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 10:22:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:196411 Archived-At: Thank you, Eli, the patch fixes my issue here, on a fresh pull of master. (I know it's been said many times before, but you rock.) I hope it works for #44002, as well. David. On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 at 15:55, martin rudalics wrote: > > > My reading of > > > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=44002#47 > > > > is that it was indeed 1x1. Citation: > > > >> > I at least think I understand the width/height mystery. The bogus > >> > window size returned is 1x1. > > > > Am I confused? > > I am. I have severe problems reading the associated code with USE_CAIRO > and/or USE_GTK defined. That's why I would have preferred to see these > 1x1 assignments explicitly triggered by handle_one_xevent and/or > xg_frame_resized rather than via read xwininfo. > > >> Do you want to put this into Emacs 27.2? > > > > No need, the problematic change is only on master, AFAICT. > > Then let's wait for Scott to answer. Scott, can you check the patch Eli > posted in https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=44794#53 for > whether it breaks the previous patch for Bug#44002. > > Thanks, martin