And, moreover, the behavior for the global vs local hook is inconsistent...

On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 10:11, dalanicolai <dalanicolai@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you for the reply. Ah, sorry I forgot to remove the parens to
> include the `pop-to-buffer` within the defun.
>
> About the 'restoring mechanism'; the global hook seems not to restore the
> window selected before running the hook.
>
> So here are the two separated test cases (they both use the 'pop-up'
> function)
>
> (defun pop-up ()
>   (pop-to-buffer "pop-up"))
>
> (defun test ()
>   (interactive)
>   (with-current-buffer (get-buffer-create "test")
>     (add-hook 'window-configuration-change-hook #'pop-up)
>     (pop-to-buffer "test")))
>
> ;; evaluate code to remove the (global) hook
> (remove-hook 'window-configuration-change-hook #'pop-up)
>
> (defun test ()
>   (interactive)
>   (with-current-buffer (get-buffer-create "test")
>     (add-hook 'window-configuration-change-hook #'pop-up nil t)
>     (pop-to-buffer "test")))
>
>
> So the 'restoring mechanism' works like you explained for the local hook
> but not for the global hook
> (where after calling 'test', the pop-up buffer will be selected).
>
> Also, I would expect that a hook just calls the hook function, and it
> would not 'restore the window
>  selected before the hook'. I would say the restoring is undesired
> behavior.
>
>
>
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 09:37, martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at> wrote:
>
>>  > I think it's a bad idea to do something that changes the window
>>  > configuration in `window-configuration-change-hook'.  It's not
>>  > unexpected to get an infinite recursion or any other unpredictable
>>  > behavior.
>>
>> People should avoid it in packages because they could easily step on
>> each other's toes.  Written carefully, it could be useful in private
>> code.
>>
>> martin
>>
>