From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Itai Berli Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27526: 25.1; Nonconformance to Unicode bidirectionality algorithm due to paragraph separator Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:10:19 +0300 Message-ID: References: <83inj8nt0h.fsf@gnu.org> <83eftwnpk0.fsf@gnu.org> <83bmp0no78.fsf@gnu.org> <83a84knlh9.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11423ae83e8ff4055420397e" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499872435 15615 195.159.176.226 (12 Jul 2017 15:13:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:13:55 +0000 (UTC) To: 27526@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 12 17:13:49 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dVJKg-0003Qo-Jv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:13:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54050 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVJKm-0006KG-2s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:13:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47212) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVJJA-0005Ia-GO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:12:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVJJ4-0006za-PB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:12:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:32881) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVJJ4-0006zS-M5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dVJJ4-0006WM-AQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Itai Berli Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27526 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 27526-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27526.149987227025001 (code B ref 27526); Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27526) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2017 15:11:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35558 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dVJIC-0006V9-IQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:11:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr0-f170.google.com ([209.85.128.170]:33247) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dVJI9-0006Uc-VL for 27526@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:11:07 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr0-f170.google.com with SMTP id r103so37562857wrb.0 for <27526@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:11:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Ube22bkONxELm3n88oINXYkaIyYhosSS+jv3iDFiUzw=; b=l6YjZGDMav37MUMLqqfmjlmsWbdnhY/b5ohNe9z9bO8txB539pIYZaBlf7edKbmjx8 MJMZBvQGwL/EfkSKbC3Na0aO+bgCDTbY4zrqbRuBIWl07nBMF02QvpKI4iu0HkMbwVUK VuzWWbSC8wPo6V9pmYeLjKNzcoc1tQ0k7OBVHqGmUvPgbCUXRkcKz+m0uBM4+hbyV7E3 X3L9fDuoj7Bay8FG4WrVWEIlgBXaJje5eR5zok+M5sU3GBfmJ+x1/CVOCmTllwRUkRWE 57a9+vsGYEd1/OSa4yZlNn1x7fLAagl/wMDWMbY/AFIiyPzJ1Lf0p/PStN4KfKNGthNx eHYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Ube22bkONxELm3n88oINXYkaIyYhosSS+jv3iDFiUzw=; b=IzfvllGrbXkSWuvYIcNxdfi0LJ/400db0uPAS3PJSxunoxkrC278Rapwe10mWaW9Vt OAONoFOSZjMvgN34M8gP24+dJLM62qcLA0Y2FivGpwn8OBWTwcwB6SsnPHeENKGCkmT8 FrCH7aa4k8BpL4NCYbKoXltwQFzUWIAhfyBtxxUHjC2qBbBkSWdL4Qa4w0eeR/5nt9tI JO6GWU0VGI4O5HJChAz4rq3CWT3UUhw3+ejbVvZklxeZ5FFo1QIqwf67fbj2ZJ7TNd24 XiD95O7NsgMzcxEDK1emTZ2ujBAHxnGQ64zZorMNrUcJoVRl77ZneXW7c3JpP4uuVjpp K0Xg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112H4kGY5kTReaQIdyLa/7uvQbpBxDBkXk7Y/+0rI6PjMf8Z2k42 Kfg2Tj7+86HesJZkOxDYd9qQMWYCqL6k X-Received: by 10.28.45.197 with SMTP id t188mr2817153wmt.78.1499872259636; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:10:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.28.197.9 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:10:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83a84knlh9.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:134465 Archived-At: --001a11423ae83e8ff4055420397e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Is there any progress with allowing the user to customize the end-of-paragraph mark to be the OS paragraph separator character? On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Itai Berli > > Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 20:01:25 +0300 > > > > You did, but it would be much nicer for a noob like me to be able to > simply type in my .emacs file something > > like: (bidi.markers.visible false), or maybe even > > > > (bidi.markers.ALM null) > > (bidi.markers.RLM =E2=8A=B2) > > (bidi.markers.LRM =E2=8A=B3) > > Sorry, I don't see why the exact way how to customize this is so > important. glyphless-char-display-control is a user-level > customizable variable, not some obscure feature that requires Lisp > programming to tailor it to your needs. > > > Isn't the Bidi feature important and complicated enough to merit its ow= n > tailored set of customizable > > parameters? > > It does have its private customizations, but this one isn't one of > them, I don't see why it should be. The characters of the Cf general > category are quite a few, and Emacs handled them all the same, because > they all have the same nature. > --001a11423ae83e8ff4055420397e Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Is there any progress with allowing the user to customize = the end-of-paragraph mark to be the OS paragraph separator character?
=

On Tue, Jul 4, 20= 17 at 8:46 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> From: Itai Berli <itai.berli@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 20:01:25 +0300
>
> You did, but it would be much nicer for a noob like me to be able to s= imply type in my .emacs file something
> like: (bidi.markers.visible false), or maybe even
>
> (bidi.markers.ALM null)
> (bidi.markers.RLM =E2=8A=B2)
> (bidi.markers.LRM =E2=8A=B3)

Sorry, I don't see why the exact way how to customize this is so=
important.=C2=A0 glyphless-char-display-control is a user-level
customizable variable, not some obscure feature that requires Lisp
programming to tailor it to your needs.

> Isn't the Bidi feature important and complicated enough to merit i= ts own tailored set of customizable
> parameters?

It does have its private customizations, but this one isn't one = of
them, I don't see why it should be.=C2=A0 The characters of the Cf gene= ral
category are quite a few, and Emacs handled them all the same, because
they all have the same nature.

--001a11423ae83e8ff4055420397e--