Hi!


> > Setting the `left-frame' frame parameter to any from 1 and up change the
> width of the fringe, while retaining
> > the width of the text area (80 characters). However, setting it to 0
> makes the text area wrap on 79 characters
> > (despite there being space for the 80:th character) while `window-width'
> still returns 80.
>
> This is all as expected: setting any of the fringes to zero requires
> displaying a continuation glyph in the text area, and since Emacs
> supports bidirectional display, we need to usurp one character cell
> from the other edge of the window as well, to make the geometry of L2R
> and R2L screen lines symmetrical.
>

Oh, this was a bit unexpected...

However, I don't understand why you need it. If the right fringe is
visible, it can hold the continuation character. In fact, I just tried this
with the left fringe set to 0 with a bidirectional text stretching multiple
lines, and the last text column didn't appear to be used at all.

Furthermore, I don't think this is what people want -- some people would
surely like to hide the fringes (especially the left) without losing one
text column. (Most Emacs users don't use bidirectional text anyway.)

When it comes to documentation, there is very little, if any, information
about this. For example, this is the description of the fringe frame
properties, it doesn't mention that setting either to zero would make Emacs
reserve a column for the continuation glyph:

    `left-fringe'
    `right-fringe'
         The default width of the left and right fringes of windows in this
         frame (*note Fringes::).  If either of these is zero, that
         effectively removes the corresponding fringe.

In the documentation of `window-width' (a.k.a. `window-body-width') it is
mentioned that the width includes the continuation glyph. However, in
`window-text-width' it is not.

It took some time to find the function `window-max-chars-per-line', which
seems to be the only way to check if there is a column reserved for the
continuation character. (term.el has replicated the logic in
`term-window-width'.)


Anyway, I think I found the real problem this time. ansi-term picks the
window size from both `term-window-width' (which correctly returns 79) and
`window-adjust-process-window-size-smallest' which doesn't take the
continuation glyph into account and says that the width is 80.

Again, I'l leaving it to others to fix it, as this is code I'm not at all
familiar with.

    -- Anders