From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gustaf Waldemarson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34589: 26.1.91; GDB-MI Display Complex Data Types Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 09:05:26 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83wolugz2r.fsf@gnu.org> <83va1aq1ui.fsf@gnu.org> <83o972pz92.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhqbe2og.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="208530"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: Robert Pluim , 34589@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 04 09:06:14 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h0ic1-000s7Q-9t for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 09:06:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49967 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h0ic0-00049M-6P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 03:06:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55299) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h0ibr-00049G-9a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 03:06:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h0ibq-00022y-HL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 03:06:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45372) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h0ibq-00022o-Ct for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 03:06:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h0ibq-000861-60 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 03:06:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gustaf Waldemarson Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 08:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34589 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34589-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34589.155168674131093 (code B ref 34589); Mon, 04 Mar 2019 08:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34589) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Mar 2019 08:05:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58916 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h0ibV-00085R-C2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 03:05:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-f66.google.com ([209.85.208.66]:40098) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h0ibU-00085E-5k for 34589@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 03:05:40 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-f66.google.com with SMTP id 10so3443374eds.7 for <34589@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 00:05:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=l7DHws9v9EU/k1gtH9CNwrywJkIlO429VNFZg2cBxow=; b=oC1yUpVLSOfQNwJNDxxOpTrGFLGCRinoxu3GCgoFerENwjiCpeLxHffXdk8Wryrmuw yunTiGB6f7iYRHpQ0NdKiGpKf+zJ92Sp6vOlEJeMVHm0BqSp1Q95vR0Ljde/srwEczNU 2XEFoF27wV79dohK1g0Yopt/gA7xX8CszFXtF3kinJ5OhV3rCQzPbvSR+/P/eEIfgCbc wHGJ7G2FiSmM4A4TjkBdYHt28B3wd2R4mGp6vKhoWtfIGErH+j56gVVXHb40lgwpehSy p+GDclDHOIrVGbF1v9jNns8sj9kPWXCndksEM5s7FRB4Lu0KBNY4/fhP3rrPq0CKeUTZ vnHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=l7DHws9v9EU/k1gtH9CNwrywJkIlO429VNFZg2cBxow=; b=bchAXxvz2rXQbStLizDczaXm0Olw7NfGO78oI7qumUcP9pwFVogcIT3AkBSQ6Zn06K KkPz4+MZPatBl7FDtx284+IYPmMktbyhlrIBD4cmVRiaHaNtJp/yCbkjJTH+SdO0DhZJ 5FdZgLTWNpK9W+aoFCERW7nKgl9qtqdXZvYaCS092Zr5llN2zPkgvavv+mee/VjSHNOO P/bb+aCdOGruC4CWY128miuvbULBTPSmaA1qtXLPr2u2FV2hUyZveWKZhB8mgANJbcMY 2TOPAitd3VHdXWeNL2vLFxhKk7weRTGVjrjZtAx8XBgdqFzFiCFsKDkX9Ky1A9tV2OAQ u8yQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWM0WxQrmIitcfswDOEJoUl4vrpL17qTa3XG7mNoM2XZreBSsye 3lszy3LJfd6Za3s+GXwvnwibGCkh5a9uS8x1UV0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzEUY4gYMqz7ybGrevKUMpFFAiL8bH51JZigGj38wfruYU45SygaTnH3a7FFoUmhcX8OvMxsClOgWUiV4YTRjU= X-Received: by 2002:a50:a5bc:: with SMTP id a57mr14641709edc.10.1551686734319; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 00:05:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83zhqbe2og.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:156020 Archived-At: >Yes. I asked about the first patch because it's small enough to be > accepted even without legal paperwork. The second one exceeds the > limits of that. Ah, got it. Feel free to review and include it if you find it useful. If Arm ever get back to me regarding the legal stuff I'll submit them then as a separate bug. Den m=C3=A5n 4 mars 2019 kl 04:31 skrev Eli Zaretskii : > > > From: Gustaf Waldemarson > > Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 21:32:46 +0100 > > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , andrew.w.nosenko@gmail.com, rpluim@gm= ail.com, rms@gnu.org > > > > > Does the first patch have value on its own? If so, we can accept it w= ithout > > > legal paperwork. > > > > I would argue that either patch have some value. The first patch enable= s display > > of the complex data types and the second changes the interface to use a > > non-deprecated function from the gdb interface that additionally lists = function > > arguments as well, something the previous one did not (at least if I ha= ve > > understood the documentation correctly). > > > > Although, the first patch in my list is the bigger one. Wasn't that par= t of the > > problem legal-wise? > > Yes. I asked about the first patch because it's small enough to be > accepted even without legal paperwork. The second one exceeds the > limits of that. >