From: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: 35328@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#35328: 27.0.50; Lisp reference, "Accepting Output": Should describe what happens to standard error
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 11:14:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAArVCkTXE5KGVXOjxCyVYSbSsc9J6WauTfyYMd=wA+3GkH_Urw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83tver896c.fsf@gnu.org>
Am So., 21. Apr. 2019 um 21:12 Uhr schrieb Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>:
>
> > From: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 15:58:11 +0200
> > Cc: 35328@debbugs.gnu.org
> >
> > > > Does the code
> > > > (while (accept-process-output PROC))
> > > > also ensure that all of the standard error has been read and passed to
> > > > the filter/inserted into the buffer?
> > >
> > > I don't think I understand why you say that node doesn't already
> > > answer this question. Why did you think standard error is special in
> > > this regard?
> >
> > The node doesn't describe what happens with standard error, e.g.
> > whether standard error is part of "output" and how it's handled.
>
> Well, it says "output", not "standard output". I take it to mean both
> output streams. If the text is interpreted to mean both streams, is
> it accurate?
I don't think so. At least empirically one has to wait for the
standard error process separately to ensure that all standard error is
read. I've sent a patch to extend the documentation to say that, is
that ok?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-22 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-19 19:36 bug#35328: 27.0.50; Lisp reference, "Accepting Output": Should describe what happens to standard error Philipp
2019-04-20 7:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-04-21 13:58 ` Philipp Stephani
2019-04-21 16:11 ` bug#35328: [PATCH] Improve documentation around standard error pipes (Bug#35328) Philipp Stephani
2019-04-22 9:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-04-22 14:08 ` Philipp Stephani
2019-04-21 19:12 ` bug#35328: 27.0.50; Lisp reference, "Accepting Output": Should describe what happens to standard error Eli Zaretskii
2019-04-22 9:14 ` Philipp Stephani [this message]
2019-04-22 9:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAArVCkTXE5KGVXOjxCyVYSbSsc9J6WauTfyYMd=wA+3GkH_Urw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=p.stephani2@gmail.com \
--cc=35328@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).