Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> schrieb am Mo., 25. Mai 2015 um 04:39 Uhr:
> The documentation of `pcase-let' is very terse.  Please expand it to
> state what happens to each binding in the case that the pattern of a
> binding matches, in the case where it doesn't match, and in the case
> where there are no binding constructs in a pattern.

I added:

   The macro is expanded and optimized under the assumption that those
   patterns *will* match, so a mismatch may go undetected or may cause
   any kind of error."



Thanks. Though I think it would be better to be more defensive and guarantee to raise a signal in the case of a mismatch.