From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Philipp Stephani
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: bug#30862: 25.3;
Need variant of `make-process' that uses file name handlers
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:10:31 +0100
Message-ID:
References: <87fu4t1tk3.fsf@gmx.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1545001746 18853 195.159.176.226 (16 Dec 2018 23:09:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 23:09:06 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: 30862@debbugs.gnu.org
To: Michael Albinus
Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 17 00:09:01 2018
Return-path:
Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from )
id 1gYfWv-0004m8-Jq
for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:09:01 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44143 helo=lists.gnu.org)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from )
id 1gYfZ2-0003am-CT
for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 18:11:12 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59918)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from ) id 1gYfYw-0003ag-7D
for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 18:11:06 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from ) id 1gYfYt-0004tf-2r
for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 18:11:06 -0500
Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46422)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from )
id 1gYfYs-0004t8-TG
for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 18:11:02 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from ) id 1gYfYs-00053t-JY
for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 18:11:02 -0500
X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org
Resent-From: Philipp Stephani
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit"
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 23:11:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID:
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30862
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords:
Original-Received: via spool by 30862-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30862.154500185019439
(code B ref 30862); Sun, 16 Dec 2018 23:11:02 +0000
Original-Received: (at 30862) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2018 23:10:50 +0000
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50680 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from )
id 1gYfYg-00053T-6f
for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 18:10:50 -0500
Original-Received: from mail-oi1-f175.google.com ([209.85.167.175]:41017)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from ) id 1gYfYe-00053G-GZ
for 30862@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 18:10:48 -0500
Original-Received: by mail-oi1-f175.google.com with SMTP id j21so8761991oii.8
for <30862@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 15:10:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=88UUGDrBepdfjPbOYsobB6u0pevPgWHOayzp0Z3OORI=;
b=g/VZVkuY7N3KCnMjjpZZdo1g48+dBMetBnluZcqcaROK8TNDOwp5ipK2zfiH4K6JKQ
bDTePw68+I4faRSLtqCRTuDggieaUIghtEAIJnhf2RMP+O4X8QFwFSuMPb5RHmOBZQIW
mj/5QBML2r6ls8Wr8oyHum2a91WiaoPHvBh8mi9HyLF3gZh1U72Hxzu0brSvq3cEyB/3
awDqPsLWRJgdvIV5XCSPGQPCy9DztUCaqwojDh5bEeydHdasd5SFiRvHNPx9YTOumFPg
WkmKo0NB1jIkSyB7CjXfTkI3oimVb0bEo4VOUodj/bYy2l7KxuejMTPwxPXgDUVO1Sin
gMUQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=88UUGDrBepdfjPbOYsobB6u0pevPgWHOayzp0Z3OORI=;
b=UXP538d/ZdfZrpue2qqoyyXUBZLvtujKLCGJioC/FeBLU9M/MUjNXng4ry1Lmq0r3S
0DntdJXfGtd6ukSak3HpYcm8ZOM9ZZfLP+VwcskH2J9Kd3TMOr3YjGe/EhH05dhVxYo9
2gPAlkhHCEH+cfcK6PIkP3Gyca7zq89jbpe9E3YQ1jh9xV42v37fDImrBN2ANuKiRWwO
naJOLj7R1hnrFpWDkrC/D2OuJRwdVMMx8A9dajwWXdsyFhPRoTesnaCGkFSjGukhCjjf
FLaol2szM93KcLMIeeH4KJIGguBo3WvjpczhUmeJCnil1eHadAbufYVtNPFaTikGzhGw
1avA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbK3POB5234ic5ERbgNXdL9rtDRCbeZvqui5N7dSzXGEQQWau6I
Je6t+5UxGME9V3BTHzNpNePY1bRlDW+lCerJdpo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/X1855mq7TW1ts8Xd3vVlgxdx2cZKO0MzDolEvIxsciqjnT/owxDWxnHDTvFDBw+c3pjN5GYh65oKhdAzxitVQ=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:4008:: with SMTP id n8mr4290694oia.161.1545001842819;
Sun, 16 Dec 2018 15:10:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87fu4t1tk3.fsf@gmx.de>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
the Swiss army knife of text editors"
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs"
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:153501
Archived-At:
Am Mi., 21. M=C3=A4rz 2018 um 13:50 Uhr schrieb Michael Albinus
:
>
> Philipp writes:
>
> Hi Philipp,
>
> > Most fundamental process-related functions (call-process, start-process=
)
> > have variants that take file name handlers into account, except
> > make-process. Since make-process is more powerful than start-process,
> > it should also have a variant that honors file name handlers. For
> > example, it could accept another keyword argument =E2=80=98:file-handle=
rs=E2=80=99
> > which, if non-nil, would invoke file name handlers based on
> > =E2=80=98default-directory=E2=80=99.
>
> I don't believe we need an extra keyword. It could be handled like
> start-file-process and process-file: if default-directory matches an
> entry in file-name-handler-list, the respective handler is called;
> otherwise the native implementation is applied.
>
> It is up to the file name handler to decide, whether a fallback to the
> native implementation shall be applied.
>
> This is different to the behavior of call-process and start-process;
> callees of make-process must be aware that a process on a remote host
> could be started.
I don't see why call-process and make-process should behave
differently in this regard. For call-process and start-process the
caller has to explicitly opt in into applying file name handlers (by
calling different functions); presumably because people consider it
too dangerous to accidentally start random processes on remote
machines. Why should make-process be different?