Eli Za=
retskii <
eliz@gnu.org> schrieb am=
So., 16. Okt. 2016 um 20:51=C2=A0Uhr:
> From: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:25:08 +0000
>
> Attached a patch that uses the wording from `define-minor-mode'.
The patch for the ELisp manual simply rearranges the same words, so
it's not clear to me why we would prefer it to what's already there=
.
As for the doc string, please avoid repetition, it's confusing.=C2=A0 I=
suggested to describe the additional features when the mode is called
from Lisp by using the word "also".
I don't think there's any repe=
tition or rearranging here. The key difference is that when called from Lis=
p with an argument that is neither nil nor an integer, the mode is also ena=
bled. That isn't possible for interactive calls because the argument is=
always a number.
Maybe something like
&=
quot;With a prefix argument ARG, enable the mode if ARG is positive, and di=
sable it if ARG is negative or zero. Additionally, when called from Lisp, t=
oggle the mode if ARG is the symbol `toggle' and interpret ARG as defin=
ed by `prefix-numeric-value' otherwise."
=
(and then document the behavior of prefix-numeric-value)