From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Philipp Stephani
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: bug#44942: 28.0.50;
Emacs should print a backtrace on uncaught errors in batch mode
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 12:07:48 +0100
Message-ID:
References:
<83lfeaan04.fsf@gnu.org>
<1DC46C7A-D0A8-4B92-84FE-3ABA2F6A6624@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
logging-data="25688"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: 44942@debbugs.gnu.org
To: Eli Zaretskii
Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 07 12:10:09 2020
Return-path:
Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.92)
(envelope-from )
id 1kmEP9-0006ZB-Sn
for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 12:10:07 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42038 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
(envelope-from )
id 1kmEP8-0007e6-V0
for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 06:10:06 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35524)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from )
id 1kmEO7-0007dx-0L
for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 06:09:03 -0500
Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41052)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from )
id 1kmEO5-0000Zs-PV
for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 06:09:02 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from ) id 1kmEO5-0000yD-LF
for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 06:09:01 -0500
X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org
Resent-From: Philipp Stephani
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit"
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 11:09:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID:
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44942
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
Original-Received: via spool by 44942-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44942.16073392873661
(code B ref 44942); Mon, 07 Dec 2020 11:09:01 +0000
Original-Received: (at 44942) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2020 11:08:07 +0000
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52598 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from )
id 1kmENC-0000wz-Mv
for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 06:08:06 -0500
Original-Received: from mail-ot1-f43.google.com ([209.85.210.43]:37345)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from ) id 1kmENB-0000wU-5i
for 44942@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 06:08:05 -0500
Original-Received: by mail-ot1-f43.google.com with SMTP id o11so9391091ote.4
for <44942@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 03:08:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=3bxiF0LlQLurdPsGSrFV6l7FwgzAB4FDziD2ZMYDHsM=;
b=AleGNj2m5iRafFVNDJ2eU1LHzXT2zPi95UdTBOwW6vvASz4jYbXDmM4hZ/5H2zpQlC
9qr2aKahPgmbSmb1tYXHT3K7+YLhXtubCuOhqeQrif7qI/RmwnyWBpngVh4grBI1aNk8
n13120PLMb/njnEVGVJLJ6Lk+nqFa+HVFqH0q7+lmWLMS1Dp/n7B96PFwfjyfM8YF7Rq
Z+fJcKTLYkcVW690hwv9SIesDIy9By0noJgUTGGbb1RhUNEgOQ9aKuzGzSStelilsIzb
7Mv+z6leyQH5EY5J2MITF48JqYOIhiggGcrCXoOKXI32x4bZDrhUn+uT19jQlEfiptWe
naOQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=3bxiF0LlQLurdPsGSrFV6l7FwgzAB4FDziD2ZMYDHsM=;
b=ulbHgxQD/WtlgzSgAYMixjYIBkJJLU40q8bSubgTmsYx/0B19ttdEnAsKhTfWSJ7dz
Htd9DQVYqySXMJFR9ytmgjVOjVmQexSNn6xqgNucNFB2BnEsiMLVWUCo8mMMJifJ5WMc
d6mcX8YThGkAlJS3wckM6kgu8KD38wOmdxEaUj15D39LDCO0Ji2otghnSzygPwPFhl1T
x5U8rRx4JSbe1FbRAAPhYYxk8os6CFV9puEnqHU1lAo8RfuzYqbxlEwQB7U3luKI0bOv
0xA1NsfufIsYzQFUarQHJLpfZN0Ypktg5r19RDQ19CVDF+DjZyIgVuLfQ/sgeKVCkD4G
aLNw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532x2HXHsx0Vh4s5C6Dcu8JdBtLcc5gnK/NTjVju3/ZG+b/MtElB
BIFTjwQtUpPEAIMgKi0oh6+q/6LKlbud8/oZZK0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw54PR0VGp3g8Vd/im5ZQVi5U4rlvF1swnjldejUyTDpqP8ZZw6EmvScBFuIl2aJGYQI8xDhzrBL6wFLS5WsHg=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:269:: with SMTP id 96mr12388679otb.174.1607339279514;
Mon, 07 Dec 2020 03:07:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1DC46C7A-D0A8-4B92-84FE-3ABA2F6A6624@gnu.org>
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
the Swiss army knife of text editors"
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs"
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195218
Archived-At:
Am Mo., 7. Dez. 2020 um 11:42 Uhr schrieb Eli Zaretskii :
>
> On December 7, 2020 12:29:16 PM GMT+02:00, Philipp Stephani wrote:
> > Am So., 6. Dez. 2020 um 18:00 Uhr schrieb Eli Zaretskii
> > :
> > >
> > > > From: Philipp Stephani
> > > > Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2020 17:50:17 +0100
> > > >
> > > > Am So., 29. Nov. 2020 um 16:27 Uhr schrieb Philipp Stephani
> > > > :
> > > > >
> > > > Pushed to master as commit 40e11743ca.
> > >
> > > This is an incompatible change.
> >
> > Is it? In other words, do we guarantee that no stack trace is being
> > printed if debug-on-error is nil? I'd say that parsing error messages
> > is brittle anyway, and we're not obliged to provide stable output
>
> The behavior did change. Since Emacs doesn't have a formal spec its long-time behavior is a de-facto standard we should strive hard not to break. As Stefan just pointed out, this change already broke 2 tests if we need any proof.
>
> > > Is there a way to get back previous
> > > behavior? If so, please mention that in NEWS; if not, let's please
> > > provide a way to get back the old behavior.
> >
> > I'd be OK adding a variable for this, but on the other hand I'm not
> > really convinced that this is really a breaking change (see above).
>
> Yes, we do need to be able to get back the old bdhavior.
Fair enough, I've added a new boolean variable for this.