Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> schrieb am Mi., 24. Jan. 2018
um 15:33 Uhr:

> Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Thanks for this great analysis. Given this, it seems that the place
> > definition for `buffer-local-value' should be removed from gv.el.
>
> But hmm - surely there are other functions where `cl-letf' doesn't
> exactly restore the previous state - `alist-get', for example:
>
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
> (setq my-alist '((x . 1)))
> (ignore (cl-letf (((alist-get 'y my-alist) 17)) my-alist))
> my-alist
> ==> ((y) (x . 1))
> #+end_src
>
> (admittedly, this is not as serious as the `buffer-local-value' case).
> Also, as another, different problematic case, the manual warns about
> `point' to be used with `cl-letf'.
>
> So, I wonder if, instead of removing the gv-setter definition for
> `buffer-local-value', we should instead add some more text about how
> `cl-letf' can have surprising effects to the manual.
>
>
>
I think we should spend significant efforts to avoid surprises. In this
case, if it means we should remove `alist-get' as well from the forms
supported by `cl-letf', then I think that's what we should do. The
documentation for `cl-letf' clearly states: "On exit, either normally or
because of a ‘throw’ or error, the PLACEs are set back to their original
values." If it can't do that for some place form, it shouldn't be allowed.