bug#73231: 30.0.91; image-dired cannot be operated until all thumbnails are created (MS-Windows)

[AKIYAMA Kouhei <misohena@gmail.com>]

> >>> By the way, why didn't you include the option to use
> >>> w32image-create-thumbnail in image-dired-cmd-create-thumbnail-program?
> >>> In other words, wouldn't it have been okay to define it like this:
> >>>
> >>> (defcustom image-dired-cmd-create-thumbnail-program
> >>>   (cond
> >>>    ((executable-find "gm") "gm")
> >>>    ((and (not (image-dired--probe-thumbnail-cmd "convert"))
> >>>          (fboundp 'w32image-create-thumbnail))
> >>>     'built-in-function)
> >>>    (t "convert"))
> >>>   "..."
> >>>   :type (if (fboundp 'w32image-create-thumbnail)
> >>>             '(choice (const built-in-function) file)
> >>>           'file)
> >>>   :version "29.1")
> >>
> >> This causes trouble for run-time tests, because a defcustom is
> >> evaluated only once, when the package is loaded by Emacs.
> >
> > What are the trouble for runtime tests? If this is implemented,
> > obviously no check for the existence of the command will be performed
> > at runtime.
>
> We are miscommunicating.
> A defcustom is evaluated each time Emacs starts up and loads the
> Lisp package which includes the defcustom.

Of course.

> That is what I meant by "run-time tests",

Ah, I misunderstood. You're talking purely about evaluation while
Emacs itself is running. I had actually considered the possibility
that you meant it that way, but there was something that seemed
inconsistent with how I interpreted your comment, so I ignored that
possibility. Sorry.

> Because the test is performed when the package is loaded, it might
> make different decisions that the user expects, because the user
> doesn't control when the package is loaded.  For example, if
> ImageMagick is installed after this defcustom is evaluated, its
> value will be incorrect from the user's POV.

Isn't that the same with GraphicsMagick? In your opinion, that means
the (executable-find "gm") part is also incorrect from the user's POV?

> > If necessary, the user can change the settings of the
> > program that creates thumbnails by themselves (after installing
> > ImageMagick or GraphicsMagick).
>
> I'm talking about the default value.  Customizing this will make the
> value fixed, not dynamically-decided.

Of course I'm talking about default values. Of course the value is
fixed when the package is loaded. And I thought that was acceptable
because I saw (executable-find "gm") written in defcustom. Is it
wrong?

> > In other words, first create
> > thumbnails with the built-in function (w32image-create-thumbnail), and
> > if a user is dissatisfied with them, they can install either
> > ImageMagick or GraphicsMagick and specify the program they installed
> > via M-x customize-variable
> > image-dired-cmd-create-thumbnail-program. Isn't this the same for most
> > other parts of Emacs? For example, if a user is dissatisfied with grep
> > and installs ripgrep, they will have to manually change grep-command
> > themselves. Isn't it the same? Why does Emacs automatically determine
> > the thumbnail creation method without the user's permission?
>
> Emacs does this in many other cases, so this is hardly an exception.

Even if you say "many other cases," it's still a minority when viewed
in the context of Emacs as a whole, right? I was simply curious about
why a different decision was made here compared to the method adopted
by the majority, so I asked. I'm not saying you should do it that
way. I just thought there might be a hint in the reasoning that could
help me understand something.

> >>> This way, even if convert is installed, users who want to try the
> >>> w32image-create-thumbnail function can explicitly select it.
> >>
> >> I didn't expect users who have ImageMagick installed to want to use
> >> w32image-create-thumbnail.  If we hear enough requests for that, we
> >> might need to reconsider.
> >
> > If the quality of ImageMagick is bad as you say, the convert command
> > may have a bug that makes it impossible to convert some images. Also,
> > if w32image-create-thumbnail is improved in the future (at least if
> > the aspect ratio and rotation are resolved), people will want to use
> > it. It seems that w32image-create-thumbnail is faster in many
> > cases. To be honest, I don't understand why you want to prioritize the
> > even more legacy command of ImageMagick, which you dislike.
>
> It's okay to disagree, but I stand by my opinion, and will not
> change this unless enough users request that.  Primarily because
> it's a complication, both technically and from user POV, requiring
> documentation etc.

I don't agree or disagree.

The reason is "it's a complication, both technically and from user
POV, requiring documentation etc." That's what I wanted to hear. I
will never tell you to do something you don't want to do. Please calm
down.

> >> Maybe we should simply have a command to check whether an external
> >> tool is installed, and then thumbnail creation will use the results
> >> of that check.  The variable that holds the result of the check
> >> could be initialized to 'unknown, in which case the first thumbnail
> >> creation will perform the check and set the variable to either nil
> >> or t.  This will probably be simpler, although it will now be up to
> >> the user to invoke the command manually if ImageMagick is installed
> >> while an Emacs sessions runs.
> >
> > So when the queue is empty, just after the last of the series of
> > thumbnails has been created, we set it back to 'unknown.
>
> That's not what I had in mind.

Of course it's not the same.

> I thought it should stay at its nil/t value until the user invokes
> that hypothetical command to perform the check again and set the
> variable to the value produced by the check.

That's fine, but wouldn't it be more natural to have them set a
customization variable rather than calling the command? Well, maybe
you don't think so.

I didn't fully understand your thoughts on the existence test of the
convert command, but I have some understanding. I hope this was
helpful for people who have the same question as me. Of course, you
are free to decide how to do it.