From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12911: 24.3.50; let users decide where (& perhaps whether)`emacs_backtrace.txt' filesare written Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:13:48 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83wqxk3d1z.fsf@gnu.org> <83y5hyxnb1.fsf@gnu.org> <83wqxhy4ha.fsf@gnu.org> <83fw45xxzk.fsf@gnu.org> <83ehjpxwqd.fsf@gnu.org> <838v9xxss8.fsf@gnu.org> <83zk2dvsba.fsf@gnu.org> <50AB0EDE.40109@dancol.org> <83r4now6jk.fsf@gnu.org> <50ABBFA4.6080402@dancol.org> <83haokw3ss.fsf@gnu.org> <5CBDAE291F7447E8834BD7E61FF36B8A@us.oracle.com> <836250vyfo.fsf@gnu.org> <83vcczvcqj.fsf@gnu.org> <50AC5276.60406@dancol.org> <58D82C28C53E4499B15C57A4FE2687F1@us.oracle.com> <71125AE486F54427AD17522CB6B03280@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1353521691 7004 80.91.229.3 (21 Nov 2012 18:14:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:14:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12911@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 21 19:15:02 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TbEpB-0000IX-JM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:15:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56956 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TbEp0-0002a0-Dm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:14:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39375) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TbEoy-0002Zv-DS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:14:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TbEox-00006g-AT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:14:48 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49223) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TbEox-00006b-7L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:14:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TbEqA-0000eg-Fj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:16:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12911 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 12911-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12911.13535217482497 (code B ref 12911); Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12911) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Nov 2012 18:15:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59474 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TbEpv-0000eB-EN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:15:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com ([74.125.83.44]:60489) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TbEpt-0000e4-B1 for 12911@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:15:46 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ee0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b47so4614742eek.3 for <12911@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:14:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=9cvYX117yqIlaNYdLz7ZEen1wy24thhlWgs/dz3Ok1w=; b=BjaY2vf5Zp/hV5nWtGz41c+HYScrY+M+tNUtn7MAzWLZkI/3vRHN4xnEI1q8MAcA9H XvtMTseDdmb6ImJXeZb6mFFqGa+t8ztMOP8Lpl56O/TFe5/XejMvncUFesLTC/j90NP9 rGz7am/zm+yN9Ho/9mI74/LW4wd+Ii1bLKSpUQtJMYl6R00hwb0CYtoeMeWpQD/O+1pn DNax3xb+fFB4emOYPnhQaCeleRmFVeVOaVdTNrQ3Y5X/NfTzcxbU1LGmIE1S2hEmNOFm cadXLvmCpxanaBMwvtwUk7hkU60isRvRM5MZvAI+SzEkEdLe2xD3iJA90cAm4pIQUVg8 bf8w== Original-Received: by 10.14.203.2 with SMTP id e2mr25290223eeo.20.1353521668764; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:14:28 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.223.4.209 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:13:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <71125AE486F54427AD17522CB6B03280@us.oracle.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:67280 Archived-At: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Drew Adams wrote: > To me, that red herring (which it is) was an ad hominem turn in the road - let's > look at Drew, not Drew's message. Mine wasn't an ad hominem, because I haven't said that your arguments are wrong because they are yours. I think they are wrong because they put emphasis in something that happens very rarely, and suggest adding complexity to something that is very simple. AND I've *pointed out* that the relative importance of that problem is greater for you than for me, because you are more likely to get affected by it. That could affect your judgment (it would likely affect mine; I get angry when people who doesn't ever use line-by-line scrolling start suggesting changes to scroll-conservatively and Emacs recentering, or when non-Windows users suggest that some changes won't affect the Windows port, or that if they do affect it, is all Microsoft's fault). > Don't get me wrong. I do not say that it was an ad hominem attack in any way; > it was not an attack. It was just an irrelevant distraction. I find an irrelevant distraction that you're discussing "[...] the etiquette that applications generally respect on Windows, in order to respect the user and user data" when the thread is specifically about *one* file, in *one* specific situation, which is a crash backtrace. Juanma