From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16733: messed up unicode chars in package description Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:07:05 +0100 Message-ID: References: <7tfvnn7phj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83zjkm865z.fsf@gnu.org> <838us496xy.fsf@gnu.org> <8338ia66fd.fsf@gnu.org> <83bnwy46p5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395500888 21023 80.91.229.3 (22 Mar 2014 15:08:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16733@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 22 16:08:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WRNWx-0000wI-3V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:08:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57266 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRNWw-000755-J0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:08:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39497) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRNWp-00074x-1p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:08:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRNWk-0003q8-9p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:08:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43728) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRNWk-0003q4-60 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRNWj-00084X-RP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:08:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16733 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16733-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16733.139550087531014 (code B ref 16733); Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16733) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Mar 2014 15:07:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44910 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRNWc-000849-47 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:07:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yk0-f178.google.com ([209.85.160.178]:61673) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRNWU-00083r-BB for 16733@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:07:52 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yk0-f178.google.com with SMTP id 79so9676230ykr.9 for <16733@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 08:07:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=pN4t2YHzdoLYne9QmmXIPrgJKN0O9t1ubcJZsP9Q268=; b=stWpMrrJjYZSnMyYrLKhfx/PUp6lVvWZ/Niy62+rQPlqo0RFKUQy+y0kFvNjj5ba3F QFUT/6tzj5J9V1COeZSuj49EzKtpu/jHUssm/FhIywnOhnvgOv3pZHmBdg+dVDpoEXX3 ntn5JP5Wf35tG+xxnhExnaCA1eWV+0ueyTXfa5iIUGlpThUcfSeLtcDXDQdIIJviKs1L CAl3aGjfHyH5AUT3DWqQvNA7LhbSK1S58dvtylztRab03vY1MllEEKP2siwuOEMZOb6/ QwcBvu0IWRzWbcphvTQMNsCwqUHv6uz1ie0DsZnkHu/8YwHD8jwZsdoa046y/15FyLRO sQJw== X-Received: by 10.236.91.67 with SMTP id g43mr1061858yhf.146.1395500865989; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 08:07:45 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.170.163.3 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 08:07:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83bnwy46p5.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:87167 Archived-At: On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > The correct fix is not much more complex, so I wonder why do we need > to settle for less than that, when the pretest not even started yet. > There's no danger to destabilize anything here. I'm not settling for anything, I wrote what I think is a better fix. But it's not my decision to say whether it is complex enough or not, or whether it goes to the trunk or the branch. I've already agreed with you that, if it were my decision, I would apply the better fix to the release branch. But at the same time, I'm not worried about the hacky fix in the branch, so I'm not willing to make a stand on this issue. J