From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17046: 24.3.50; On startup emacs frame has no minibuffer or windows decorations Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 21:23:32 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87bnx1me40.fsf@capuchin.co.uk> <21290.58790.335300.154622@capuchin.co.uk> <21291.6197.146546.329133@capuchin.co.uk> <532B4069.80908@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395347109 13207 80.91.229.3 (20 Mar 2014 20:25:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 20:25:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17046@debbugs.gnu.org, Robert Marshall To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 20 21:25:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WQjWe-0002Hu-5n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 21:25:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49128 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WQjWd-000729-Pl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 16:25:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46282) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WQjWW-0006le-1X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 16:25:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WQjWR-0007fg-5n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 16:25:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41506) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WQjWR-0007f0-1r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 16:25:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WQjWP-0003Q6-PQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 16:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 20:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17046 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17046-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17046.139534705713084 (code B ref 17046); Thu, 20 Mar 2014 20:25:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17046) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Mar 2014 20:24:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42688 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WQjVg-0003Ov-9q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 16:24:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yh0-f54.google.com ([209.85.213.54]:62303) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WQjVd-0003Om-8b for 17046@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 16:24:14 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yh0-f54.google.com with SMTP id f73so1465044yha.13 for <17046@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 13:24:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=p40ALxNb7QETFwofGN8gZQPz1OPwMdW9evkTDb4Ilps=; b=j95l4t7XWwwkstXX3v5i2zzcac/vHg1XlLijaY5TRPz1zjwQQcDUXE+sbQWwYs/6AC unT8bLCXfeiIQHxdwtwa6epNsIqkvv1ZXPsb9mrwo8M/LQJlB/MkGvdjW17R3WFw7JtK KwfkoPYQls3k1IBcS1Enp04o5Fp4JX9CJkUzsyqLec0OLNJ5Z4Ht56Zf3cu+r3T/iWYQ ByG5ktCVAgOTuB70rKeJ4Wj7aVf5AeCnGx4cN35y0De0LaZzyE10anWUjBtpTZru7jnS lRxD3dC9IoCP1InilIr48IhG5K2OejCmilA6TcvvFHjXO+eNJ2gc6ekYztU0+UE/IA6u JfvA== X-Received: by 10.236.169.33 with SMTP id m21mr5241933yhl.137.1395347052591; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 13:24:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.170.163.3 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 13:23:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <532B4069.80908@gmx.at> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:87063 Archived-At: On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 8:24 PM, martin rudalics wrote: > Obviously a total-height of 0 for FRAME 1 is broken - it should look > like for FRAME 2. Just that a total height of zero shouldn't have any > bad consequences - it would get swallowed by `split-window'. I checked, and it doesn't cause any trouble when restoring. > And the > differences in frameset--mini, are they OK? >> (frameset--mini t) >> (frameset--mini t . t) Yes. The first t means that the frames have their own minibuffer. The second t means that that frame's minibuffer was the one pointed out by the `default-minibuffer-frame' variable. When restoring, default-minibuffer-frame will be set to that frame, but that would only affect new minibufferless frames, so it doesn't seem to have any influence in the reported bug. J