From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17046: 24.3.50; On startup emacs frame has no minibuffer or windows decorations Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:40:25 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87bnx1me40.fsf@capuchin.co.uk> <532DAA47.5020101@gmx.at> <532DAD2D.9050508@gmx.at> <21293.47677.273344.433965@capuchin.co.uk> <532DD9C8.2090209@gmx.at> <532DE5C8.3070308@gmx.at> <21293.61407.237813.539443@capuchin.co.uk> <532E022A.1010401@gmx.at> <21294.2992.133359.234317@capuchin.co.uk> <532EB366.8070801@gmx.at> <21294.49676.124258.183227@capuchin.co.uk> <532EC7F7.2060307@gmx.at> <21294.58410.934138.908538@capuchin.co.uk> <532EE6F9.50003@gmx.at> <21294.61472.376055.235383@capuchin.co.uk> <532EF5F3.5040706@gmx.at> <21294.64295.631988.273738@capuchin.co.uk> <532EFDB1.9020902@gmx.at> <21295.1905.505188.563594@capuchin.co.uk> <532F10C7.6030801@gmx.at> <21295.5581.394024.241655@capuchin.co.uk> <532F19C0.4020902@gmx.at> <21295.7482.513409.93351@capuchin.co.uk> <21295.14057.185786.863083@capuchin.co.uk> <21295.21403.534064.434296@capuchin.co.uk> <21295.59468.82731.2394@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.7931.103056.823206@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.12737.48072.487144@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.19864.25566.342047@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.22701.448897.930196@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.26536.10078.165484@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.32260.291274.364373@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.42153.768572.7270@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.46373.182060.426183@capuchin.co.uk> <21297.11355.705621.35886@capuchin.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395744134 14151 80.91.229.3 (25 Mar 2014 10:42:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:42:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17046@debbugs.gnu.org To: Robert Marshall Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 25 11:42:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WSOoD-0000sG-DQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:42:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40586 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSOoD-0007Go-2w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 06:42:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45476) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSOo4-0007FZ-Ng for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 06:42:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSOnz-0000RR-OB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 06:42:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47317) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSOnz-0000RJ-KY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 06:42:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WSOnz-0001bA-1B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 06:42:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17046 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17046-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17046.13957440726064 (code B ref 17046); Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17046) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Mar 2014 10:41:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48499 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WSOn9-0001Zk-A1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 06:41:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yk0-f170.google.com ([209.85.160.170]:42606) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WSOn4-0001ZT-FY for 17046@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 06:41:06 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yk0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 9so623475ykp.1 for <17046@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 03:41:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=jLknBQnHFJ6iZ1tjaz41+Y9iz+ytK1GfpD/6X1cfaSY=; b=pOJhL1N9+SrTJ4qpJ66LV2YeSdNVx3QdbiF3QTF/qjsiwVdKNpRKPAPjppB8PZBAvo WLQdzlOhGu+wXaJWCXeDhFIeCNJNJjiTtIZTYOGFw8tJDUE1hdvbYE95eXOLoGrL3nXQ voGCgsJ4yWXecPxq/nKvEyZuayC3XT1ierXRcWVbj3KhLywC6g0waX/3LKs7j68KMfxQ /hKfFErb6zl29be1nmpus7yp4+6jLHD+Fk/OmDfOQFKS5pf2TlwExtSL9P4i0iIr/mf3 PX+gOgagHuittE0F+mVioBSqC7Nq53Gd7QLBpVLsb8QB3WzU6quPc42jgLq/VCejhcEP 1K/Q== X-Received: by 10.236.60.68 with SMTP id t44mr72105574yhc.47.1395744065744; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 03:41:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.170.163.3 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 03:40:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <21297.11355.705621.35886@capuchin.co.uk> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:87352 Archived-At: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Robert Marshall wrote: > No bug with that line commented That's great news! Sort of... :-( That line's here because on some systems (Windows, among others), (make-frame '((height . X))) and (modify-frame-parameters (make-frame) '((height . X))) do not give frames of the same height (that's bug#14795). Apparently, in your system, modifying a frame size with (tool-bar-lines . 0) triggers a window manager (or Emacs redisplay) bug. If you evaluate this in emacs -Q, does it fail too? (let* ((default-frame-alist nil) (frame (make-frame '((width . 80) (height . 20)))) (tool-bar-lines (frame-parameter frame 'tool-bar-lines))) (discard-input) (read-event nil nil 2) (modify-frame-parameters frame '((tool-bar-lines . 0) (width . 60) (height . 25))) (modify-frame-parameters frame `((tool-bar-lines . ,tool-bar-lines))))