From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14595: Erroneous composition of lambda in emacs-lisp buffers with prog-prettify-symbols enabled Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 05:01:48 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83fvwjvje3.fsf@gnu.org> <83zjuqu5ud.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371351790 31182 80.91.229.3 (16 Jun 2013 03:03:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 03:03:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14595@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 16 05:03:10 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo3FE-0007DV-Tv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 05:03:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39575 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo3FE-0007Hy-EC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:03:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58096) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo3FA-0007Hq-Bz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:03:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo3F8-00045K-Jb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:03:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52984) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo3F8-00045C-H0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo3F8-0003iv-51 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 03:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14595 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: Bug-Gnu-Emacs Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.137135176214246 (code B ref -1); Sun, 16 Jun 2013 03:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2013 03:02:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47300 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo3En-0003hf-AK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:02:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56246) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo3Ek-0003h2-6r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:02:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo3Ed-0003zi-Qh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:02:32 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:38896) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo3Ed-0003zd-OH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:02:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57957) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo3Ec-0007GY-Lv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:02:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo3Eb-0003yN-Qy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:02:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ee0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::229]:33474) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo3Eb-0003yE-Jq; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:02:29 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id d17so1073310eek.14 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 20:02:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=9wizr/ARoye+ZhNod4bv4Mou5aorkUfx6AxiT6JUziY=; b=AArhx7b847vQ2ZuQa5EQCy4TypS35atrHfpS5ZEbT/NOE4JC9vfQVRoRykHgFFHFgD /aAfYO9tBQQw1Hf2FbwXvT/JGs+3kPQ7eJ7dfZ/ctTSRaj1Jjyl09T+afwHnjAmhsqs2 NhVLFxNi8dRFETsyuUJFa3m4573ISc7PXUNrcFPWTuQD/KqPnXRzXLjy9gqCLCBYchg5 rAL9T8paB07I+9eh0QFQ0pWM89JGwaMC7xPWq05IoqfFfMVVysi0Ba+0gPuvS8HrDleP mkB7AKkFYnWZ38yuTWvS7aN6Alw4OCsFT/hmKCmEKlRg9XEAjXN3BIpJu6iYfHWkTDCO /HDA== X-Received: by 10.15.76.71 with SMTP id m47mr10098712eey.70.1371351748379; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 20:02:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.14.142.4 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 20:01:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83zjuqu5ud.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:75188 Archived-At: On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I wasn't aware of any inconsistent display or scrolling behavior in > his description. Juanma, can you repeat that description, which I > probably missed? With a file containing 1000 identical lines "(lambda (x) x)", the lambdas that were incorrectly composed depend on the direction you scroll the buffer. Scrolling from the beginning towards the end (page by page), I got about 30 errors, always in the same positions (distributed non-uniformly). If you repeat the experiment, but go immediately to the end and scroll up, you got a different number of errors (double or so) at different possitions, also consistents from one run to the next. I suppose that's what Ted is talking about. J