From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20839: 25.0.50; file-in-directory-p doesn't understand windows backslashes Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:03:14 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83zj3ykt9z.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3p9l8o5.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3f5be76a8bb0518c7ea8d X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1434621864 17240 80.91.229.3 (18 Jun 2015 10:04:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 10:04:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20839@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 18 12:04:17 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5Wg8-0005gA-9e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:04:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51487 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5Wg7-0005eH-9V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 06:04:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32812) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5Wg2-0005e9-Qe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 06:04:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5Wfy-0004bv-Hs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 06:04:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38194) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5Wfy-0004bF-EW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 06:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5Wfy-0003GN-0F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 06:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Artur Malabarba Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 10:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20839 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 20839-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20839.143462180512492 (code B ref 20839); Thu, 18 Jun 2015 10:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20839) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2015 10:03:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50391 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5WfL-0003FO-QJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 06:03:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-la0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]:35581) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5WfI-0003F9-R7 for 20839@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 06:03:21 -0400 Original-Received: by labko7 with SMTP id ko7so51095407lab.2 for <20839@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 03:03:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=plWuXm2S4uw3vTBs+kRKRW3zUV55TQ/iktyPOLcj7To=; b=Y4V2Y4Grh4+sg4PxddlxIlMn+xOU35hOwFLcic2QrvRKjp2lPIoyQ+r0rxdbwV/JHV U/Cqhk40Fpd53mO8+ojF832+Q1cDpiSai4XgM60DRQV0FFhN7AK4L0Zdbi9n9PxV9d2k CygNCbipRRV1MU9LPVvgPxEcmdlwwwotMbzxvVTPCNmErvcLvJO3HCAP2n6x8vXrbSS6 oIMOuge821w7Zk4USCHyczN1ErLgZdlP0xRTAKrYq9JH9ZSpYL1KybH+KvWhwcS2lpWN Pli05HRoXtBn8Wgi3Hd79/JV5d99v/lXdsYqNNlveXtVo9Q05Jb15JBRmBqA6FAkiGAy SnOg== X-Received: by 10.112.25.69 with SMTP id a5mr12207228lbg.16.1434621794755; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 03:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.214.133 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 03:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.214.133 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 03:03:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83r3p9l8o5.fsf@gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: y_oOIUwovziuSGPY8HC_aV-Ts3M X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:104069 Archived-At: --001a11c3f5be76a8bb0518c7ea8d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Jun 18, 2015 9:31 AM, "Eli Zaretskii" wrote: > > > Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 21:13:13 +0100 > > From: Artur Malabarba > > Cc: 20839@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > I was aiding someone remotely and I assumed this was the issue. I'll ask them > > to file a bug report themselves. > > I see no bug report, Well, it's been only 13h. :-) > and I suspect the user might be contempt with the > "sledgehammer" (their word) solution mentioned there, and so that > report will never materialize. Actually, he's been responding to my questions even after posting his solution, so he's probably willing to help. >Should we close this bug? Yes. We should close it anyway. I was just going to tell him to M-x report-emacs-bug, so that would be a new report anyway. > has one more unknown, as far as I'm concerned: the value of 'dir'. > That comes from this, AFAICS: > > (package-desc-dir pkg-desc) > > So it would e nice if the value that comes out of that on that user's > system could be reported. I think it's the same value you get on the package description buffer, but I can't check ATM (floor closed off as a fire hazard). In any case, we can give him an advice to report that value if he files a report. > Also, could any of the other packages that user loads overload the > functions involved in calculating file-in-directory-p? Well, this *is* emacs. --001a11c3f5be76a8bb0518c7ea8d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Jun 18, 2015 9:31 AM, "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 21:13:13 +0100
> > From: Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@gmail.com>
> > Cc: 20839@debbugs.gnu.or= g
> >
> > I was aiding someone remotely and I assumed this was the issue. I= 'll ask them
> > to file a bug report themselves.
>
> I see no bug report,

Well, it's been only 13h. :-)

> and I suspect the user might be contempt with the
> "sledgehammer" (their word) solution mentioned there, and so= that
> report will never materialize.=C2=A0

Actually, he's been responding to my questions even afte= r posting his solution, so he's probably willing to help.

>Should we close this bug?

Yes. We should close it anyway. I was just going to tell him= to M-x report-emacs-bug, so that would be a new report anyway.

> has one more unknown, as far as I'm concerned: the = value of 'dir'.
> That comes from this, AFAICS:
>
> =C2=A0 (package-desc-dir pkg-desc)
>
> So it would e nice if the value that comes out of that on that user= 9;s
> system could be reported.

I think it's the same value you get on the package descr= iption buffer, but I can't check ATM (floor closed off as a fire hazard= ).
In any case, we can give him an advice to report that value if he files a r= eport.

> Also, could any of the other packages that user loads o= verload the
> functions involved in calculating file-in-directory-p?

Well, this *is* emacs.

--001a11c3f5be76a8bb0518c7ea8d--