From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20231: 25.0.50; package.el mangles non-ascii content in downloaded archive-contents data Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 16:21:46 +0100 Message-ID: References: <6343E9EC-9E23-4D44-9CD1-82C26DB7CDA3@sanityinc.com> <8292DA72-0898-47B2-A1C1-F7D94A52A437@sanityinc.com> <878udysfn2.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <83mw2eecne.fsf@gnu.org> <874momsbsi.fsf_-_@violet.siamics.net> <83egnqe9a9.fsf@gnu.org> <80D6D15A-8911-4460-A516-1D22B5B656C2@sanityinc.com> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429456942 4778 80.91.229.3 (19 Apr 2015 15:22:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 15:22:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ivan Shmakov , 20231@debbugs.gnu.org To: Steve Purcell Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 19 17:22:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yjr2x-0001vW-5U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 17:22:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48833 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yjr2w-00079N-6E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:22:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50019) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yjr2s-000797-89 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:22:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yjr2o-0001D2-Uw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:22:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42801) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yjr2o-0001Cy-R7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yjr2o-0007XW-BI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:22:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Artur Malabarba Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 15:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20231 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20231-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20231.142945691428941 (code B ref 20231); Sun, 19 Apr 2015 15:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20231) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Apr 2015 15:21:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60810 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yjr2g-0007Wj-A4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:21:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com ([209.85.217.172]:35996) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yjr2e-0007WV-3b for 20231@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:21:52 -0400 Original-Received: by lbbqq2 with SMTP id qq2so113734555lbb.3 for <20231@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 08:21:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pZMFvTkt55IWbmGVtbSgw/7/mvHFN8kfP2E4CtLvd2s=; b=uCtDdQsLDrIvA334NwJrUO44SKMqr2V6mPOH9Q0NprlEWcZYs5lstOl9x44fbBgEaw 7zPn9kUeqeKrr+EvzVHxgztdpQ327emm1s6SWLsd41+UcrvcOWkRliT7yhC8gYgWxqWV BRFrfblAGj+qeZJuczjztmG6ZkUbDU64XhmRwANcuFeT+HxEudTfKuzFCHIgrUyWWjIZ gnDlKrVv3yhDrm0VBdpNAJYctPs2iptq6cN11uNC9FH+RW23zketkfgKKeA1UW0mlIHs 05K7U7qCFUG+1N14rG5fS1WsuYMvpFFpAKeWH25drALhwmu8UuRQdFDCBFBj1X3tcjaH CFBA== X-Received: by 10.112.125.138 with SMTP id mq10mr12313326lbb.35.1429456906198; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 08:21:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.150.1 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 08:21:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <80D6D15A-8911-4460-A516-1D22B5B656C2@sanityinc.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9bGBOQ1Nt4kC8Ayq7j0QqZN7zpI X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:101720 Archived-At: I can do it. Is the copyright cleared or do I mark this as a tiny change? 2015-04-13 21:45 GMT+01:00 Steve Purcell : > On 13 Apr 2015, at 15:02, Stefan Monnier wrote= : >> >>>> It is also slower. Again, I have no idea if speed matters in this >>>> case. >>> I vote for the fastest approach. Now that package-refresh can be done >>> in the background, any post-processing done in the foreground is all >>> the more noticeable by the user. >> >> Either way is fine by me. Just one detail, tho: if you let-bind >> coding-system-for-read, please only do it around the call to >> insert-file-contents and not around the subsequent code (even if it's >> short and seems not to matter). > > > Not sure at this stage who=E2=80=99s going to do this, and what the conse= nsus is for how it should be done. It=E2=80=99s probably quickest if someon= e who has an opinion about the best fix just goes ahead and commits whateve= r variation of my patch is considered optimal.