From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19390: 25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:01:37 -0200 Message-ID: References: <86a92oddfp.fsf@yandex.ru> <86mw6nkc6n.fsf@yandex.ru> <54904241.8010000@yandex.ru> <5490BFCD.5050505@yandex.ru> <5490ED6D.5080808@yandex.ru> <868ui5ervl.fsf@yandex.ru> <5492AE61.3040902@yandex.ru> <5492F68C.3090700@yandex.ru> <54931452.30000@yandex.ru> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418929348 31884 80.91.229.3 (18 Dec 2014 19:02:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 19:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19390@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 18 20:02:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1gL2-0008M0-8s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 20:02:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55409 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1gL1-0000Rh-NQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:02:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39415) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1gKu-0000R7-2a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:02:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1gKo-0003V5-Kn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:02:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41168) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1gKo-0003V1-IJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:02:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1gKo-0007W4-6m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:02:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Artur Malabarba Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 19:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19390 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19390-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19390.141892930028860 (code B ref 19390); Thu, 18 Dec 2014 19:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19390) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2014 19:01:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50534 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1gKS-0007VQ-3p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:01:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:32794) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y1gKQ-0007VJ-PZ for 19390@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:01:39 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id uy5so4861906obc.4 for <19390@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:01:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=bKI1JIgreoxwl+WZ1OVL6QHVz5+mSOPJZYCTqpUHRwQ=; b=dMWYZORvlaf4xDzBRehqiJIEKOSp2IG3Fyn+ZaB8cX1SaGOnUo2wWa+e4sJYdo/GfU CxugzHLsnZOeowXmMOOalJ9+lI9sivCbv370DtFi+ABx6CTKm92q6Zr3qKYZGQjQya7o 2pR8DO4BjjJcktFu8e0colbJ5iWB7qwo+28CWE7wK8XbWepTdZOUlMJk+NaBqYwjea9b Q2v2POiQ/aeUcCK/8+rblGeuZnNUZ+ivro5FvGOalE8W3nJmXBDHeNhL3HY8Ll0xvA3B kmuwL4F7jqm9jwH1ihpyqyoIJlNgYTuYvPHubKs96fsSNh3aQY0V/y7nB56A1US2aSJX mWig== X-Received: by 10.202.188.66 with SMTP id m63mr2196772oif.26.1418929298208; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:01:38 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.76.26.162 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:01:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54931452.30000@yandex.ru> X-Google-Sender-Auth: Ne8VGeq04lqV2AIGpOKba3JeSxg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:97544 Archived-At: Sorry. The rest of the message was just babling anyway. I was just saying the performance hit of the current implementation is negligible when upgrading. Which is the same thing Stefan is saying. 2014-12-18 15:52 GMT-02:00 Dmitry Gutov : > On 12/18/2014 07:39 PM, Artur Malabarba wrote: > >> During package-initialize these things add up, so that's certainly a >> lot. But during a regular upgrade, what fraction of the total load time >> does that amount to? Even for large packages like helm I think this >> percentage should be small. But > > > ^^ > The message cuts off here.