From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21032: package.el acts pecularly Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 09:09:36 +0100 Message-ID: References: <559F6AE5.8030109@gmail.com> <55A16C83.3040605@gmail.com> <55A1FD00.3060700@gmail.com> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d100c40bdfc051aa9202a X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1436688619 15198 80.91.229.3 (12 Jul 2015 08:10:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 08:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21032@debbugs.gnu.org To: Vaidheeswaran C Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 12 10:10:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZECKy-0005cK-VD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 10:10:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49985 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZECKy-0007u8-34 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 04:10:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49422) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZECKt-0007sH-Tx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 04:10:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZECKo-0005oe-T9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 04:10:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45772) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZECKo-0005oJ-OD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 04:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZECKo-0005Sb-83 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 04:10:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Artur Malabarba Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 08:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21032 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21032-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21032.143668858420962 (code B ref 21032); Sun, 12 Jul 2015 08:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21032) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2015 08:09:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47218 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZECKW-0005S1-4r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 04:09:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-la0-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48]:33160) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZECKU-0005Ro-Ab for 21032@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 04:09:42 -0400 Original-Received: by laar3 with SMTP id r3so286489923laa.0 for <21032@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 01:09:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=iFUTwGHILsF29o4hN4N1vJLX/m+7uZeG9E/qeND0Jms=; b=mBR19HW6yjc+IAZLavo91u+cBcBLhPNZ82NOvh+rt91m472FcHvHtdANxTInTHlJ2E K6odeUOG078B6dd5/iHGSgR7bTjaaPGPMU8vLWEzd3j6qkwsH04fsjkoPtZa+L/RSDXt Uw84+COtiEYCM614YFhSvEQuNpMv2EGXdpzrHfcwa/paCE6zxmBB4/ujhXz8mIAjsPym W6yE1mmtyONAoiTzOENJ9wySbVvHIPp3nZ4ac+1eCxnM08772Q9sA99YEGlf2EVwRxTq aGcyngqpYtDsbT3dJ2Z5RO7TLrQqWSDdGP1dk3YPTFMt0i8yPaZdYxPZG9Cb/CcAkklM b4Rg== X-Received: by 10.152.4.163 with SMTP id l3mr27612219lal.35.1436688576460; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 01:09:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.214.133 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 01:09:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.214.133 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 01:09:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55A1FD00.3060700@gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2pw4FxCECLtIAxZ7GsqlwgsBed0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:104923 Archived-At: --089e013d100c40bdfc051aa9202a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Jul 12, 2015 6:37 AM, "Vaidheeswaran C" < vaidheeswaran.chinnaraju@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sunday 12 July 2015 04:28 AM, Artur Malabarba wrote: > > > >> Error contacting: http://blah.blah.blah:/archive-contents > >> error in process filter: peculiar error: 404 [2 times] > > > The second error is saying that the page was not found. > > Removing the second error and rewording the first error is good enough > for me. Actually speaking, there is no "second" error. There is only > one error. Yes, it would be nice to improve the error message. > The peculiar error is coming from `edebug-report-error'. I really > think that user doesn't care much about the "innermost" errors. So, > catching such errors and re-throwing it is a good idea. Even if one > (as a developer) wants to see the "inner" errors, the *Messages* > should reflect the "innerness" of the fact by (say) parenthesizing it. Sounds great. :-) --089e013d100c40bdfc051aa9202a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Jul 12, 2015 6:37 AM, "Vaidheeswaran C" <vaidheeswaran.chinnaraju@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:
>
> On Sunday 12 July 2015 04:28 AM, Artur Malabarba wrote:
>
>
> >>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Error contacting: http://blah.blah.blah:/a= rchive-contents
> >>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0error in process filter: peculiar error: 4= 04 [2 times]
>
> > The second error is saying that the page was not found.
>
> Removing the second error and rewording the first error is good enough=
> for me.=C2=A0 Actually speaking, there is no "second" error.= =C2=A0 There is only
> one error.

Yes, it would be nice to improve the error message.

> The peculiar error is coming from `edebug-report-error&= #39;.=C2=A0 I really
> think that user doesn't care much about the "innermost" = errors.=C2=A0 So,
> catching such errors and re-throwing it is a good idea.=C2=A0 Even if = one
> (as a developer) wants to see the "inner" errors, the *Messa= ges*
> should reflect the "innerness" of the fact by (say) parenthe= sizing it.

Sounds great. :-)

--089e013d100c40bdfc051aa9202a--