I'm sorry I didn't reply. I think Noam's analysis makes sense, and what he suggests should be implemented. The problem is real, and should be rectified.

Ken

On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 3:32 PM Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:

Noam Postavsky <npostavs@gmail.com> writes:

> If (or find-file-visit-truename find-file-visit-truename) is nil, then
> find-file-noselect would really return a new buffer in that situation,
> so it would be correct to kill it (i.e., with these settings, we are in
> case (a)).
>
> Do I have a mistake in the above?

This was over a year ago, and there was no response to this question, so
I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please
respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report.

--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no