From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ken Manheimer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#42218: 28.0.50; Fix for missed item undecoration on allout-widgets-mode deactivation Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 16:09:51 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83d04ti7z1.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0yyghgc.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7u2gfb2.fsf@gnu.org> <83ft9mgf5p.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dc686e05aae517ef" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9844"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 42218@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 20 22:11:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jxc7x-0002Tl-BF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 22:11:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38068 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jxc7w-0008Hg-36 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 16:11:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57846) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jxc7q-0008HZ-4E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 16:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52993) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jxc7p-0001PK-RR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 16:11:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jxc7p-0002uk-ML for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 16:11:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ken Manheimer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 20:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42218 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 42218-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42218.159527581711143 (code B ref 42218); Mon, 20 Jul 2020 20:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 42218) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jul 2020 20:10:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36305 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jxc77-0002tf-24 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 16:10:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com ([209.85.128.54]:36555) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jxc74-0002tQ-7B for 42218@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 16:10:14 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 17so720180wmo.1 for <42218@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 13:10:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qnfFEdOlsd322a4IYJ2z3kSX0Eq1M2kNKBftoYpUzuE=; b=WmUK3WBxTFt5BQsGi8tgdboeiL6bHNRyTmO/+7y+2kqGr9PoO2CCeM1VIrJZw1Ugz0 Y5gazwfKbObItSeTYCX0lNdWfZ1tIgLp+uanZxYI7q/hVdBc82GxO4WBsGTo1ZZCa4Sm KpDyX12u7px24Qt6oucs5WgzdkOhSMGOYyLA6odmd8WWz010si99lWBMujq1fp1ZNkYh ae7mK1D64UJZ6MsbPw/a5kYkhyvqKhEg+arX5PiWFlhqbc/+CT2aKFz4FP8NGx/fJLcb pSgmIZUmTAXib3NlQhWGFLqN6A+vWmcQpngG4JmNm0ml8HDxycjCMpBxHJSpTmycJ/XX qeXA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qnfFEdOlsd322a4IYJ2z3kSX0Eq1M2kNKBftoYpUzuE=; b=p4Rb2xeSjWLVr/GD+/21VdqgSqjui7v9Wb+v6Yg+xt1SWjCgJZuBrBln15OcBi1fg/ ysMt+7RUATA4ecqWZXGwgJ1atkYEThsh3EDrxRcdVZcHrFaSfdX5dN333RIfJogbdZyv bOQqQpsqUFJheY5LH3DjlL3aWA6zw9OS3JJ5NPiqw+coC09EJu1/CyLz5pQ4ksD3kMD/ 46yN53P9bDXGY1XCFEAi4fCo55fUvsmafg87MVZd6s0OaMdQqFvnvgc/wMlnhQT3xWsM oFVc/+4nw/YDBBUJP2c8LFC4C5fqX7/amQ8a6Uh2DXSGoqN9DUtkBxwcv2rtCOLpKjuE D+vw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532dzoCXZri52yLpb0siPgO3SVueb0EAhFExNZ4CzGczcW6qUYwB zEZLiqFrZq1evu899bEcS/s+O7FexTr12kjFNTo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz3AzS057SeQJVtyHBGOw1mrHt8SxrmD5bidKOgnanlujH2Dii6l1FSL9/QchRxUzYlKFpiFd6rO8am5+g/DpU= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7ed7:: with SMTP id z206mr802601wmc.135.1595275808105; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 13:10:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83ft9mgf5p.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:183329 Archived-At: --000000000000dc686e05aae517ef Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 3:28 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 22:24:49 +0300 > > From: Eli Zaretskii > > Cc: 42218@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > > I'm sorry I didn't wait for your reply, I already pushed to the > emacs-27 branch (as well as master). I will avoid > > > committing to a release branch in the future. > > > > Please revert that commit you made > > To clarify: I meant to revert it on emacs-27 only; it should stay on > master. > Understood. In my local checkout of the emacs-27 branch I have reversal of the five commits ready to push upstream. I'm sorry to bother you further with this, but rather than risk compounding the problem I want to double-check that reversing the commits (rather than, eg, reversing the changes in new commits) is the right way to go, before I push upstream. I know that this is a different situation than to problem-prone one of doing a reset and pushing that, but haven't pushed reversed commits and want to be sure. (This time I will wait for your reply rather than just going ahead.) Thanks! Ken --000000000000dc686e05aae517ef Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 3:28 PM Eli Zaretskii= <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-l= eft:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 202= 0 22:24:49 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Cc: 42218@d= ebbugs.gnu.org
>
> > I'm sorry I didn't wait for your reply, I already pushed = to the emacs-27 branch (as well as master). I will avoid
> > committing to a release branch in the future.
>
> Please revert that commit you made

To clarify: I meant to revert it on emacs-27 only; it should stay on
master.

Understood.

In my local checkout of the emacs-27 branch I have reversal of the fi= ve commits ready to push upstream. I'm sorry to bother you further with= this, but rather than risk compounding the problem I want to double-check = that reversing the commits (rather than, eg, reversing the changes in new c= ommits) is the right way to go, before I push upstream. I know that this is= a different situation than to problem-prone one of doing a reset and pushi= ng that, but haven't pushed reversed commits and want to be sure. (This= time I will wait for your reply rather than just going ahead.)
<= br>
Thanks!
Ken
--000000000000dc686e05aae517ef--