From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nathan Eagleson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16820: 24.3; nxml comment block indentation issue Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:43:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: <3518A4CF-32D9-4C35-8D13-DF77C770FAFD@nateeag.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000089b69005b24d8bdf" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27801"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 16820@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 23 04:44:14 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kVn3t-00079H-Op for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 04:44:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47516 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVn3s-0005xA-Cb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:44:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37088) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVn3i-0005x3-6W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42838) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVn3h-0003dW-Sv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:44:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVn3h-0005jQ-Oh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:44:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Nathan Eagleson Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 02:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16820 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 16820-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16820.160342101421989 (code B ref 16820); Fri, 23 Oct 2020 02:44:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16820) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2020 02:43:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54384 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVn3G-0005ia-G8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:43:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ot1-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:35959) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVn3E-0005iN-HB for 16820@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:43:33 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ot1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 32so59502otm.3 for <16820@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 19:43:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OGWnFByyJENi7nWKyyzMONf2mtM5IY48Wr3IySNnR3k=; b=c5IzYBUirErZreguvS2EK/6E85msVN0M2dmy1S7XE1aQxeEOmomZAMS7V9GQ4OqcEZ iMEhNlno+Mari/NMijyHuz93Yx6llUJI15yzB7PABvSy56zZyh4JSFDFIQLH5wgc2e+B 4CqX6Q4J1QlUu3SroluHf62IVSULkVUFbKZ4+LuKmVY5ltpG9WFnCiDsN+Lelm7nS30Q F4tvUSwrWyqkfb98B49ndz5gKVdkP5TJf3axLxI6dy1091VRq7/kxKr5wqBH9srsDN0o lDzqQfmap2hnnpp8gqIQPBNAbwTANI1dOjqD4yZIhDm35361hR8u6y6O+dKJCIp+8pRS m3og== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530OB5ZD6CM4luag8JmKnVavt0eEsZHqWwec4r0rgetCZk0Sp97F iA2SE5qMeC6FP0TomXkOr7hcwgex5NaGsJHqPBTRrdhn X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw/BG90cXbSifiFBp0hkZ/WoJ8i8IWsJCyGni4lBOhaX+mZfy3A5wiqcICowvLXaS19HWtXk8wDa849aIcZXmM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:134c:: with SMTP id r12mr61031otq.240.1603421006835; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 19:43:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:191331 Archived-At: --00000000000089b69005b24d8bdf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sure thing. I'm sorry for completely missing your first request for info. On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 12:03 PM Stefan Kangas wrote: > reopen 16820 > tags 16820 confirmed > thanks > > Nathan Eagleson writes: > > > Sorry, I missed your original request. > > > > This seems like a bug to me because multi-paragraph comment bodies are > > usually indented to align with the comment start token. > > > > If you strip trailing whitespace on save, this behavior results in bad > > comment indentation, something like: > > > > > > > > This is all from distant memory, so apologies if I'm describing it > > incorrectly. > > Oh, right. Yes, that indeed does seem like a bug. Reopening. > > Thanks for writing back. > --00000000000089b69005b24d8bdf Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sure thing. I'm sorry for completely missing your firs= t request for info.

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 12:03 PM Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se> wrote:
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-l= eft:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">reopen 16820
tags 16820 confirmed
thanks

Nathan Eagleson <n= ate@nateeag.com> writes:

> Sorry, I missed your original request.
>
> This seems like a bug to me because multi-paragraph comment bodies are=
> usually indented to align with the comment start token.
>
> If you strip trailing whitespace on save, this behavior results in bad=
> comment indentation, something like:
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<!-- First line of comment is here. It may go on= for
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0several lines in a format something like you'd = expect.
>
> After the blank line, the comment is outdented relative to the
> comment start/end markers.
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0-->
>
> This is all from distant memory, so apologies if I'm describing it=
> incorrectly.

Oh, right.=C2=A0 Yes, that indeed does seem like a bug.=C2=A0 Reopening.
Thanks for writing back.
--00000000000089b69005b24d8bdf--