From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: isaac lewis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27325: Using '&rest' without a trailing parameter causes an error in emacs 26.0.50 Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 03:22:56 -0400 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1497165850 1558 195.159.176.226 (11 Jun 2017 07:24:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 07:24:10 +0000 (UTC) To: 27325@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 11 09:24:07 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dJxEE-0000BZ-FS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 09:24:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33085 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dJxEH-0003c3-V6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 03:24:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48451) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dJxEB-0003bc-PI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 03:24:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dJxEA-0002Bg-V8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 03:24:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36981) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dJxEA-0002BA-Qx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 03:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dJxEA-0003qN-Hc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 03:24:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: isaac lewis Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 07:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 27325 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.149716578914712 (code B ref -1); Sun, 11 Jun 2017 07:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jun 2017 07:23:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39658 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dJxDJ-0003pE-0F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 03:23:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57345) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dJxDH-0003p1-LA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 03:23:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dJxDB-0001qG-Pn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 03:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:49534) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dJxDB-0001pn-Ms for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 03:23:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48310) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dJxDA-0003Xx-KH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 03:23:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dJxD9-0001p8-Tz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 03:23:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]:34168) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dJxD9-0001ow-Q4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 03:22:59 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id s64so761293oif.1 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 00:22:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=w0ennuv5YKrptwa+SlT6lEzDdGsjXwHFQ55GLI8wRgg=; b=TVOGVWzhHzagbSdEhP0TrWyM/e6qC5Js8Z6pVpSxLvDsg7s5C6Wi80FEwU/m4oRxR6 Grd/SLLMsctc5ieSdsLEdTtZqaQJ2T78QhYkJSuUWoYEMVxYWy0AHdbFyH2b0S+CvYWg Xg+7q+seOOMeEgT0lYXbW9eC1cEyQzHCA6qShEaALUJzqpBQyUzFhP5o28UdviiVV9Vh QPVXF3ipKFcAQHBTbWdp+HpTo9JWwmGBV0ZxJgYycYwfoG/Olsm0TgaQ+geyetBbByCN AhCa93f23yHfjOrgpXRobW5+YHtJ5jJ2jzF2stTToaziS97Cbw0kLGRp/avs/CAtxeIo RcyA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=w0ennuv5YKrptwa+SlT6lEzDdGsjXwHFQ55GLI8wRgg=; b=pHVkvVfO0hcjvO+J831mi8IwxtOynd6GxkAxXJFYk936FP4H57g9W4nLet4nLpoCiv dknhFtEDQ+IyXNcRslc/VQHQtU/wu8rLDlcn9DcIMYvHwRfLCAPcmnM6SiFcZZeVT/+L gFMOLKGSXfRvMTHb3JGGZQDGRPQ83zjaDkoFpT23dHd8bCO4GG9IMJ67jBJevsLAruYv 9CUGd40eojqZOqluo1ouqxvZNmIuD+93O0oKzC3uhywVfPALreixwg4CoqlaZQR5qbsz GmZHFs8JNGPvaatINrKqBSVYhxBGueVKpKuMz4rlCnWp0GIgNz/aNgAPvHGHed0B1kNr 2jyg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAze6s29HWN2Ek+k8tuVYDJQoz1tloywGQr1mco9rPVL9f2SNKV RV2KvApQr1Sk9P35jMzShkecHKKZhg== X-Received: by 10.202.73.76 with SMTP id w73mr6134267oia.92.1497165777244; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 00:22:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.182.123.115 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 00:22:56 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:133463 Archived-At: If my understanding is correct, the functions (lambda (&rest) t) and (lambda () t) should behave similarly. In emacs 25: (equal (apply (lambda (&rest) t) nil) (apply (lambda () t) nil)) => t as expected. But evaluating the same sexp in emacs 26.0.50 causes an error. -- Isaac Lewis