From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jean-Christophe Helary Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26925: Improve /doc/lispref/strings.texi (split-string) documentation Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 12:31:54 +0900 Message-ID: References: <93AB3C85-27C1-48FF-8C3D-B90B4CF33670@gmail.com> <83o9up2hli.fsf@gnu.org> <7F0AE9BE-93FF-4CF7-8F76-AE1BD0CFDDDC@gmail.com> <83inkx2eeu.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaoxoty1.fsf@rosalinde> <3D9A3600-CF3D-4DD9-866C-CBEE8F692B25@gmail.com> <83o9u5bde1.fsf@gnu.org> <12A8E2CE-F2F5-4DB9-88DE-BCD40513EEBA@gmail.com> <83h8zxb02p.fsf@gnu.org> <98B33B3E-AB18-4BDB-A012-5270F3FCD7C2@gmail.com> <83bmq4bhpv.fsf@gnu.org> <87efv09oqj.fsf@detlef> <83a85nc0tu.fsf@gnu.org> <5D1082E3-48E6-4A39-B831-55BA992C7CC9@gmail.com> <8337bfbvs0.fsf@gnu.org> <83r2yz9mnb.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1496633591 685 195.159.176.226 (5 Jun 2017 03:33:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 03:33:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 26925@debbugs.gnu.org, stephen.berman@gmx.net, michael.albinus@gmx.de To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 05 05:33:07 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHilO-0008L5-C4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 05:33:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59413 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHilT-00059K-DG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 23:33:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53514) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHilN-000592-ND for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 23:33:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHilK-00035V-HB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 23:33:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53648) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHilK-00034z-Dq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 23:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHilK-0003GC-2g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 23:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jean-Christophe Helary Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 03:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26925 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 26925-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26925.149663352512469 (code B ref 26925); Mon, 05 Jun 2017 03:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26925) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jun 2017 03:32:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56324 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHikP-0003F3-DH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 23:32:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.83.42]:36479) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHikN-0003EZ-M7 for 26925@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 23:32:03 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id a70so6980979pge.3 for <26925@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 20:32:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=AsqE/TvciRLakNCq0gg+k+RqrcA3888dRvX3ymqmjzs=; b=CJKP+S08ihpLiBYmJezMABw/Ri0Ubzmw+eYcQ7oDki1WKFyZIlAE3Y2pz1jsf1m1yh Q4Epk3t/YH8nOLMn4UPZa4/7xosJjppbbZHmYpH7vnUAuQ/f/JWyNh71qIHbBKPEZe4/ n6SUlUSkkIDzbyLNaJXjr5rbU1vxHB+8Dhn2Ee/8yfin0RPCnT8ynqoiUqaGeAfZj72L fkq5eBDFTRnWe7OZvdiZxC6Rd/hZ+W2z/HL9D0gnnomKdQ0CjkOav7qlESsZRtrIYfQ4 eclEY+EVXWjp2AnkgcXYERkPPSs4UqaJC1rtEtwlO8sBKvx3zx7sE6oNdhdfPVVc9lBy j9PA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=AsqE/TvciRLakNCq0gg+k+RqrcA3888dRvX3ymqmjzs=; b=VKM5QR3/j231GxvAwVhxA94hhGXH9bMzbQUUdtd8RjI1bmTw7CGo7JFl7QSAP4kyoJ LxS3BhQbfmMkUp7N28pOlINUdrc6bJ8bpmiBpq3Meyl5qhupPYKH9he+D9L6i0ZAFKIR j7ULdhnItufaVdSE+nFv7LB7Nw0ojbjwQv5XqjR7mXDI0hlM5syrKhiqMP/malbAMMVT ArIAaGsagkmmphWHhCM5lQwbr5dGbkHoPqHbbFkVC7zJjnR0I551XFOA+Tg3Ts3048QX W/U+F54TZl1oAaoIOmogVW8wXUzVpSBX3SzYOmn+0vgJQB7GqSpJZrog4+DuVlhSuYL1 PgXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAKIvhL4oO4j0iFHJJa8KWGlSrnZ0bVbC+TGWqnvArIbaExhHBO Ld+611dcfaFzuw== X-Received: by 10.84.137.165 with SMTP id 34mr12566726pln.167.1496633517865; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 20:31:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.24.55] (pl2587.ag0304.nttpc.ne.jp. [128.53.196.27]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l85sm54431043pfj.130.2017.06.04.20.31.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 04 Jun 2017 20:31:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83r2yz9mnb.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:133278 Archived-At: > 2017/06/05 11:46=E3=80=81Eli Zaretskii =E3=81=AE=E3=83=A1=E3= =83=BC=E3=83=AB: >=20 >> not correct to worry about various styles being used seemingly at = random, then I learn from that. If you tell me that it is not necessary, = which you did, then I can argue that I feel better if the few lines I = was involved with are tidied up. >=20 > I'm not sure I understand the last sentence, but if I do, then no, you > shouldn't worry about random changes of style, as long as the text is > accurate and is correct English. This is, after all, descriptive > text in plain English, not a formal document. Ok, I understand, it was just that I felt I could make my original = modification look nicer. I drop it. Thank you. >> Does that mean that you suggest we explicitly declare them optional = in split-string ? >=20 > Yes, I think so. Ok, I'll do it. Jean-Christophe=20=