From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, 73559@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#73559: [PATCH] fix NS build focus-in event processing
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 08:51:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C01B6126-3461-4EE6-92E1-C0637B406EAA@dancol.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86h69x2lud.fsf@gnu.org>
On September 30, 2024 8:38:18 AM PDT, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 07:20:26 -0700
>> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>
>> CC: 73559@debbugs.gnu.org
>>
>>
>>
>> On September 30, 2024 4:41:49 AM PDT, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> >> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>
>> >> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 22:47:46 -0400
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> In Emacs NS build, frames don't respond to focus-in events right away.
>> >> Instead, they store the focus-in event and process it (and other queued
>> >> events) whenever some other event happens to occur on that frame.
>> >
>> >Hmm... isn't this the same on all other GUI systems?
>> >kbd_buffer_store_event adds the event to the Emacs input queue, and
>> >AFAIU it will be processed as soon as Emacs gets back to its main loop
>> >and calls read_char. No other event should be needed, AFAIK. Po Lu,
>> >am I missing something here?
>> >
>> >> This patch kicks the NS event loop immediately when a focus-in event
>> >> happens, allowing Emacs to respond to focus-in events without some other
>> >> event triggering the processing.
>>
>> I don't recall what we do for other systems, but for NS, we don't wake up the event loop as a side effect of kbd_buffer_store_event by itself. We rely on something else waking up the loop draining events from the queue. Changing the kbd_buffer_store_to_event to wake the main thread unconditionally would be another option, but seemed like a bigger change.
>
>That's not what I meant. kbd_buffer_store_event doesn't trigger
>reading from the queue, AFAIU. Emacs does that itself, when it
>becomes idle: it calls read_char as part of its main loop, and that
>reads from the input queue.
Yes. So now imagine that Emacs is idle and not the focused window. I command-tab to it. Now Emacs is the focused window. I would expect Emacs to have run the functions in focus-in-hook by now, but it didn't, because when we got focus, we queued the focus event but didn't wake up the main thread to process it. Now I hit a key. Emacs wakes up, drains its event loop (firing off focus-in-hook functions), and processes my keystroke. Isn't it correct for Emacs to run that hook immediately when it gets focus, not some time after?
In general, I don't see why we'd wire it up such that the event queue can be non-empty and the main thread asleep indefinitely. If we have an event to process, then in all circumstances, we should process it, yes?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-30 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-30 2:47 bug#73559: [PATCH] fix NS build focus-in event processing Daniel Colascione
2024-09-30 6:55 ` Stefan Kangas
2024-09-30 11:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-09-30 14:20 ` Daniel Colascione
2024-09-30 15:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-09-30 15:51 ` Daniel Colascione [this message]
2024-09-30 16:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-09-30 17:05 ` Daniel Colascione
2024-09-30 17:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-09-30 17:50 ` Daniel Colascione
2024-10-05 10:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C01B6126-3461-4EE6-92E1-C0637B406EAA@dancol.org \
--to=dancol@dancol.org \
--cc=73559@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=luangruo@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).