From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ram Bhamidipaty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22220: 24.5; no documentation for default process sentinel Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:54:12 +0000 Message-ID: References: <837fk6queu.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3idq1db.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1450893328 1194 80.91.229.3 (23 Dec 2015 17:55:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "22220@debbugs.gnu.org" <22220@debbugs.gnu.org> To: John Wiegley , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 23 18:55:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aBnd6-0003M8-0n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 18:55:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57281 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBnd5-0005vC-AN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:55:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45789) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBncw-0005jK-Sr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:55:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBncr-0004Do-WD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:55:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53570) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBncr-0004DS-TB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:55:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aBncr-0000Qg-MX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:55:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ram Bhamidipaty Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22220 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22220-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22220.14508932601594 (code B ref 22220); Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22220) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2015 17:54:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32939 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aBncB-0000Pd-V1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:54:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-bn1bon0081.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.111.81]:7340 helo=na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aBncA-0000PS-R6 for 22220@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:54:19 -0500 Original-Received: from BLUPR0101MB1555.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.163.118.26) by BLUPR0101MB1428.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.163.118.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.361.13; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:54:12 +0000 Original-Received: from BLUPR0101MB1553.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.163.118.24) by BLUPR0101MB1555.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.163.118.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.361.13; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:54:12 +0000 Original-Received: from BLUPR0101MB1553.prod.exchangelabs.com ([10.163.118.24]) by BLUPR0101MB1553.prod.exchangelabs.com ([10.163.118.24]) with mapi id 15.01.0361.006; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:54:12 +0000 Thread-Topic: bug#22220: 24.5; no documentation for default process sentinel Thread-Index: AdE8Vt0yhgfex/qTQOqx6UdhV2nl8QAhQ69VAAzqu6AACP4syAAdJWdQAABwQiA= In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rbhamidipaty@roku.com; x-originating-ip: [216.38.147.4] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR0101MB1555; 5:97VWh9WJ2hjkr4UG3FIyXiP5WNvQZ7en9hYk1UEj/LFQqOcjNH+QH+XxKsuRmi+9/EdQ2k4xGpJ7lJTIsNfZyuFwwt+mh3TekG+83OMgsZAPYzVvTRsVZJM+TpY3eSgQHqp9dLGu7Y6nxF8OJQAWAQ==; 24:EFOz2FCYn572LSGL/qUsqZJ9U5ixLOJMK3lcelKoT99baYhreGrqYj2k316dNU5mI8liQb2/Zwz0ltWqueerldiveJ1vvh6cDyJNPSX1kc8= x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR0101MB1555; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(169088704739312); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2401047)(5005006)(520078)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001); SRVR:BLUPR0101MB1555; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR0101MB1555; x-forefront-prvs: 0799B1B2D7 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(13464003)(199003)(189002)(377454003)(5008740100001)(11100500001)(2900100001)(16601075003)(1096002)(2950100001)(5004730100002)(15975445007)(92566002)(105586002)(106356001)(10400500002)(40100003)(586003)(3846002)(102836003)(122556002)(77096005)(6116002)(1220700001)(97736004)(5001770100001)(5001960100002)(19580395003)(81156007)(189998001)(19580405001)(86362001)(93886004)(50986999)(87936001)(74316001)(54356999)(5003600100002)(76176999)(66066001)(101416001)(5002640100001)(33656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR0101MB1555; H:BLUPR0101MB1553.prod.exchangelabs.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: roku.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Dec 2015 17:54:12.5102 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 00fc7e42-ad65-4c4c-ab54-848ba124a5b7 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR0101MB1555 X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; BLUPR0101MB1428; 2:82RI2Yywh5zYdGU2sdq7cxdwBrKOJvCFqn2psz0TfSszfB8hrJEOrdMQeXf+xl+I0AJirM4ABoWLaj59Mtr+Meyl5YW5wRFtu9+gbGIj0PP4oCDyJAgrNK9lpsKBGkpQKU5kHJE4rc4OvdZzA4RZgw==; 23:3FaCqu4KZeevUiUNkb9w/aVqf3xWcmWp6QNhwUTG7Zc4n4Cy3DTL0spnNmZ6Pe8CeuwlkhAr07K5/Wf/+KM5f55HS8+zd/G9+IdFTgoqsaUdnMti7/NhRpa1khgiKvkG3sQ8pX4BdyNvWIlvVrbBusihqbC10TKj3SZIIeEmJklyE1ioUBFfuzliBRj3R63F X-OriginatorOrg: roku.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:110314 Archived-At: There is also a slight problem with the set-process-sentinel docs - there r= eally isn't anything that says a process starts with a default sentinel - e= ven if the set-process-sentinel function is not called. The current docs set-process-sentinel docs just say what happens if the sen= tinel argument is nil. Careful reading certainly implies that the default s= entinel will be given to a process - but surely this kind of information ca= n be more explicit. -Ram -----Original Message----- From: John Wiegley [mailto:jwiegley@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 9:34 AM To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Ram Bhamidipaty ; 22220@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#22220: 24.5; no documentation for default process sentinel >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> It would be nice if the default process sentinel were explicitly documen= ted >> - at least the name and formal description. > As for the name, why is that important? You can always get it installed f= or > the process using nil as the argument to set-process-sentinel, and the > implementation is in C, so how would the name help? I must admit to a similar confusion. Aside from the fact that more could be said: does more need to be said? --=20 John Wiegley GPG fingerprint =3D 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2