From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8492: 23.3; Time to use a different binding for completion? Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 20:12:29 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87zknuhxl4.fsf@sc3d.org> <773F1105A680404C90121E510917AFAF@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303497459 29629 80.91.229.12 (22 Apr 2011 18:37:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 18:37:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8492@debbugs.gnu.org To: Reuben Thomas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 22 20:37:34 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QDLET-0001hc-NO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 20:37:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35972 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QDLET-0001Jc-61 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:37:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48430) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QDLEQ-0001JL-FC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:37:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QDLEP-0001nd-E3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:37:30 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56422) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QDLEP-0001nZ-Ah for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:37:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QDKqj-0006ZT-NU; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:13:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lennart Borgman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 18:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8492 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8492-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8492.130349597725248 (code B ref 8492); Fri, 22 Apr 2011 18:13:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8492) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Apr 2011 18:12:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QDKqe-0006ZA-Fl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:12:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ew0-f44.google.com ([209.85.215.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QDKqc-0006Yw-Vt for 8492@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:12:55 -0400 Original-Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so268756ewy.3 for <8492@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:12:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=3EIBMu7HkRYzKQcqA47/VKxl2nHnkRgp5zahm0xVwVU=; b=cXOxPnWF9pvvgIYpTyS6/xmiVpy6j3UvDaOHUKy1dYHSMv+9LOSMehAsqKNlfdyTRW w6t//3FxjwvyinEP1cHoi8TPKDRjeEGTL9ODBZu7RQpicoVFuA13TqKDE23Aia0SeHP+ RSgo1jnfU/nt45AQ92CRekW59DvtUiRtngVk4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=hn38uWTomDoMZI/zVMEKaj6B17RMwW7/zFUaxlkYGfJZYETIuHANsTFAIveLX3BUxm 9YFm2D82FzPMC404QnOFVmmWqTKBAsgdM/2Q4HiZSFYYgNTT6pLFG+gQRH4S6lIy64az FVMv/mDWm7Wg0j7qk7u+6oodFfl5xgoiaWVtU= Original-Received: by 10.213.103.80 with SMTP id j16mr314792ebo.96.1303495969132; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:12:49 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.213.23.8 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:12:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:13:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:45946 Archived-At: On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote: > >> If you do not think this is a problem then I guess you also could >> accept an argument for moving for example C-x in Emacs to >> another key? > > No, because that would change the default Emacs bindings in a major > way. No-one is suggesting changing them in a major way, and no-one is > suggesting changing Viper or CUA at all! Not in short time. But in the longer time we have been discussing adjustment. I think the most probable way is to have a way to adjust all key bindings so that they fit better with CUA. Though I doubt it will be the default in our life time ;-)