From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reuben Thomas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8492: 23.3; Time to use a different binding for completion? Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:14:07 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87zknuhxl4.fsf@sc3d.org> <773F1105A680404C90121E510917AFAF@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303418260 17697 80.91.229.12 (21 Apr 2011 20:37:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 20:37:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8492@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 21 22:37:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QD0d1-0000jQ-IB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 22:37:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47019 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QD0d1-000218-4p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:37:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40811) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QD0cz-00020p-La for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:37:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QD0cy-0008C7-N6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:37:29 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56013) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QD0cy-0008C3-LC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:37:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QD0HG-0001tV-SG; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:15:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Reuben Thomas Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 20:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8492 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8492-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8492.13034168587214 (code B ref 8492); Thu, 21 Apr 2011 20:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8492) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2011 20:14:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QD0GX-0001sJ-Pv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:14:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exprod7og113.obsmtp.com ([64.18.2.179]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QD0GV-0001s5-7c for 8492@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:14:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob113.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTbCQEEO8d/SxN0sayOOT4Gfc+7htbE7g@postini.com; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:14:15 PDT Original-Received: by pwj6 with SMTP id 6so63805pwj.4 for <8492@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:14:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.68.38.102 with SMTP id f6mr493371pbk.199.1303416848369; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:14:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.68.59.198 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:14:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:15:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:45932 Archived-At: On 21 April 2011 20:54, Lennart Borgman wrote: > > The same has been said about CUA-bindings. Both cua-mode and viper are > parts of Emacs and parts that many users depends on. There are other > emulations that are not that important. In fact I do not know of any > people still using the other emulations. > > But the fact is that many people using Emacs depends on cua-mode and > viper. Sure, so from time to time those bindings have to be updated when new incompatibilities arise with the default Emacs bindings. How is that a big deal? -- http://rrt.sc3d.org