* bug#38813: Make comint-tests more robust
@ 2019-12-30 13:57 Mattias Engdegård
2019-12-30 15:20 ` Michael Albinus
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mattias Engdegård @ 2019-12-30 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 38813; +Cc: Michael R. Mauger
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 169 bytes --]
There seem to be races in the new comint-tests; they frequently hang and/or fail when run (make check) on macOS.
This patch should improve matters. OK for emacs-27?
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Make-comint-tests-more-robust.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 3303 bytes --]
From b5ec344dc37408bc97385476767df953a47d0061 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Mattias=20Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= <mattiase@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 14:10:02 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Make comint-tests more robust
* test/lisp/comint-tests.el (comint-test-no-password-function)
(comint-test-password-function-with-value)
(comint-test-password-function-with-nil):
Call accept-process-output twice, with a slightly more generous
timeout (100 ms), after sending the Password: prompt to the
process, since there must be time for some back-and-forth
communication. Also clear the process-query-on-exit flag, since
it doesn't go well with noninteractive tests.
---
test/lisp/comint-tests.el | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/lisp/comint-tests.el b/test/lisp/comint-tests.el
index c04134599f..9960f5e65d 100644
--- a/test/lisp/comint-tests.el
+++ b/test/lisp/comint-tests.el
@@ -64,10 +64,11 @@ comint-test-no-password-function
(with-temp-buffer
(make-comint-in-buffer "test-comint-password" (current-buffer) cat)
(let ((proc (get-buffer-process (current-buffer))))
+ (set-process-query-on-exit-flag proc nil)
(comint-send-string proc "Password: ")
- (accept-process-output proc 0 1 t)
(comint-send-eof)
- (accept-process-output proc 0 1 t)
+ (accept-process-output proc 0 100 t)
+ (accept-process-output proc 0 100 t)
(should (string-equal (buffer-substring-no-properties (point-min) (point-max))
"Password: PaSsWoRd123\n"))
(when (process-live-p proc)
@@ -87,10 +88,11 @@ comint-test-password-function-with-value
(with-temp-buffer
(make-comint-in-buffer "test-comint-password" (current-buffer) cat)
(let ((proc (get-buffer-process (current-buffer))))
+ (set-process-query-on-exit-flag proc nil)
(comint-send-string proc "Password: ")
- (accept-process-output proc 0 1 t)
(comint-send-eof)
- (accept-process-output proc 0 1 t)
+ (accept-process-output proc 0 100 t)
+ (accept-process-output proc 0 100 t)
(should (string-equal (buffer-substring-no-properties (point-min) (point-max))
"Password: MaGiC-PaSsWoRd789\n"))
(when (process-live-p proc)
@@ -110,10 +112,11 @@ comint-test-password-function-with-nil
(with-temp-buffer
(make-comint-in-buffer "test-comint-password" (current-buffer) cat)
(let ((proc (get-buffer-process (current-buffer))))
+ (set-process-query-on-exit-flag proc nil)
(comint-send-string proc "Password: ")
- (accept-process-output proc 0 1 t)
(comint-send-eof)
- (accept-process-output proc 0 1 t)
+ (accept-process-output proc 0 100 t)
+ (accept-process-output proc 0 100 t)
(should (string-equal (buffer-substring-no-properties (point-min) (point-max))
"Password: PaSsWoRd456\n"))
(when (process-live-p proc)
--
2.21.0 (Apple Git-122.2)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* bug#38813: Make comint-tests more robust
2019-12-30 13:57 bug#38813: Make comint-tests more robust Mattias Engdegård
@ 2019-12-30 15:20 ` Michael Albinus
2019-12-30 16:19 ` Mattias Engdegård
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Albinus @ 2019-12-30 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mattias Engdegård; +Cc: Michael R. Mauger, 38813
Mattias Engdegård <mattiase@acm.org> writes:
> There seem to be races in the new comint-tests; they frequently hang
> and/or fail when run (make check) on macOS.
> This patch should improve matters. OK for emacs-27?
> - (accept-process-output proc 0 1 t)
> + (accept-process-output proc 0 100 t)
> + (accept-process-output proc 0 100 t)
The usual pattern is (while (accept-process-output proc 0 nil t))
That's what I do in tramp-tests.el
Best regards, Michael.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* bug#38813: Make comint-tests more robust
2019-12-30 15:20 ` Michael Albinus
@ 2019-12-30 16:19 ` Mattias Engdegård
2019-12-30 18:28 ` Michael Albinus
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mattias Engdegård @ 2019-12-30 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Albinus; +Cc: Michael R. Mauger, 38813
30 dec. 2019 kl. 16.20 skrev Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de>:
> The usual pattern is (while (accept-process-output proc 0 nil t))
> That's what I do in tramp-tests.el
Thank you, but that only works if inside another loop, and then it is a busy-wait, right?
We don't really have a predicate to tell us when we need to stop waiting, unless we use the test condition for that.
We could do
(while (accept-process-output proc 0.1 nil t))
which isn't strictly necessary since the test logic guarantees that only two accept-process-output calls should be needed, but it doesn't hurt (much).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* bug#38813: Make comint-tests more robust
2019-12-30 16:19 ` Mattias Engdegård
@ 2019-12-30 18:28 ` Michael Albinus
2019-12-30 20:05 ` Mattias Engdegård
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Albinus @ 2019-12-30 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mattias Engdegård; +Cc: Michael R. Mauger, 38813
Mattias Engdegård <mattiase@acm.org> writes:
>> The usual pattern is (while (accept-process-output proc 0 nil t))
>> That's what I do in tramp-tests.el
>
> Thank you, but that only works if inside another loop, and then it is
> a busy-wait, right?
I'm not sure. Some months (years?) ago there was a discussion about on
emacs-devel, and AFAIR this form was proposed by Stefan.
If needed, I could check the archives.
Best regards, Michael.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* bug#38813: Make comint-tests more robust
2019-12-30 18:28 ` Michael Albinus
@ 2019-12-30 20:05 ` Mattias Engdegård
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mattias Engdegård @ 2019-12-30 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Albinus; +Cc: Michael R. Mauger, 38813-done
30 dec. 2019 kl. 19.28 skrev Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de>:
> I'm not sure. Some months (years?) ago there was a discussion about on
> emacs-devel, and AFAIR this form was proposed by Stefan.
>
> If needed, I could check the archives.
Thank you, I don't think that's necessary. The improved patch has been pushed to emacs-27.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-12-30 20:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-12-30 13:57 bug#38813: Make comint-tests more robust Mattias Engdegård
2019-12-30 15:20 ` Michael Albinus
2019-12-30 16:19 ` Mattias Engdegård
2019-12-30 18:28 ` Michael Albinus
2019-12-30 20:05 ` Mattias Engdegård
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).