From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Shigeru Fukaya Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13553: 24.3.50; incorrect usage of IS_DIRECTORY_SEP Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 17:36:48 +0900 Message-ID: References: <83ip6kjcy1.fsf@gnu.org> <8338xnje9r.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1359275869 10404 80.91.229.3 (27 Jan 2013 08:37:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 08:37:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13553@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 27 09:38:08 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TzNke-0005ee-F2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:38:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35376 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TzNkM-0006Kb-LD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 03:37:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45993) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TzNkI-0006Im-Rn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 03:37:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TzNkG-000296-5z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 03:37:46 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45534) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TzNkG-00028x-27 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 03:37:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TzNkX-0004CB-U2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 03:38:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Shigeru Fukaya Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 08:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13553 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13553-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13553.135927583316072 (code B ref 13553); Sun, 27 Jan 2013 08:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13553) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2013 08:37:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50998 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TzNjk-0004BA-UW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 03:37:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.220.44]:63664) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TzNji-0004B3-OU for 13553@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 03:37:11 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id hz11so983907pad.3 for <13553@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:36:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:in-reply-to:references :message-id; bh=ujahwvaBDnAho5PPSn57snCREvtM8ZbUr+MFqGDTpvQ=; b=ZS495ntb9ybOPhL9nfG2JjDRuINvT4efQf9gB/Ig+22lMHBi7jimIgc+P8t4yOsZ7d TQeyR8+OMGFKNpI0P6hINqiNMHgCAB6X+jwImk81Nb4uTS1isLpWWbFOFQT810nvmyqp PY1O2F34lbsx4kGvXDepJp8D8xi2Fx38xFt7ds5co3ABKaxnnN+CGgM1e1BCPnOJSoR3 B1m8ytlOiZP5Lz2BT86audLOK0ur9djwHrzxDeiM2qzil8o3xBniOWiXoZjn1U/PwDu2 HpVA7k7s7xAnOzZLrLpTOGMPi5UYXqKK/UmjOIwDsuq9ebCQLlvVqc8rJSrYMpNxp98O IL2A== X-Received: by 10.68.237.135 with SMTP id vc7mr28185738pbc.2.1359275811413; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:36:51 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from gmail.com (115x125x38x6.ap115.ftth.ucom.ne.jp. [115.125.38.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jo6sm4038342pbb.5.2013.01.27.00.36.48 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:36:49 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: HidemaruMail 6.00 (WinNT,601) In-Reply-To: <8338xnje9r.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:70370 Archived-At: One more, please. CharNextExA/CharPrevExA work based on dynamically specified codepage. And, _mbspbrk/_mbslwr are also used in w32.c. They work based on MS Window's locale setting. Isn't it inconsistent? _mbsinc/_mbsdec would simply be sufficient? (Besides, I don't know well, _mbslwr seems to me lower latin characters' case on some locale. Is it true, or intended behavior?) Thank you, Shigeru >> From: Stefan Monnier >> Cc: shigeru.fukaya@gmail.com, 13553@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:24:37 -0500 >> >> CharNextExA and CharPrevExA, in my mind, do perform the moral equivalent >> of decoding the argument (just in an incremental way). > >No, they are the equivalents of NEXT_CHAR_BOUNDARY and >PREV_CHAR_BOUNDARY, except that they can do this for many different >encodings, not just for UTF-8.