From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Arthur Miller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9054: 24.0.50; show source in other window Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 15:56:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87k4bovfd0.fsf@sophokles.streitblatt.de> <87eea09rwg.fsf@gnus.org> <878s05wxx8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87tuisras8.fsf@gnus.org> <2444c393-7fb9-825b-4601-36027f653b4a@gmx.at> <87mtojmgfb.fsf@gnus.org> <8d4774f6-a8b8-ebbb-e83d-64e3f5f9c1d3@gmx.at> <45571080-4705-38c8-89a6-a41762cf95c2@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20393"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 9054@debbugs.gnu.org, Juri Linkov To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 26 15:57:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mUUeU-00051K-3N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 15:57:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60086 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUUeS-0005r9-6p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 09:57:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57690) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUUeM-0005r1-LY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 09:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55131) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUUeM-0001vj-DX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 09:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mUUeM-00031e-1w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 09:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Arthur Miller Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 13:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9054 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 9054-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9054.163266457311572 (code B ref 9054); Sun, 26 Sep 2021 13:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9054) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2021 13:56:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38443 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mUUdZ-00030a-Hp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 09:56:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-db8eur05olkn2017.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.92.89.17]:50272 helo=EUR05-DB8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mUUdW-00030O-Q9 for 9054@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 09:56:12 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=H/9RdIqO6m28Aj9HwYX77j0bcTGSBPztUnJW8liowrQcThJMKBgzlUtXxC6rN3XndkBBafX4CYwN1+q+NjTtkhPEx6U6xd367jqU6pW8maYMpRbupwSQcRy/bZmJLgY5WJNZe4vOdrIIs+bFaGx+heIMJxcl3JwcrcERJyCZ0k0EOe0xucA8su289XjGASb08ikmLNdCKBQU54tv0Q0+eBXLjOqK1PlqnOpMfnRTvU6BYki5i6KaW31qAg7REJgfl6k7Ac01F7XitP7AyKUj67O6ism3iZc7gae4oC51p+TUjwj+Eg46ZMJV6RW/LFiaCNHURWptExIqdmc+W7WKlA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=XMSGebL4IoRLlmZVpZ3EE2rRRp93I2j3+xb3Tgk0lyA=; b=nH2PJgXXNBfAo3exnX4kHGsTKtf0dDHdC/XSHcaZ+syD74k9ZUPKSPGny+agLUPoXkzC5nvCC+ztsng5ga3KVY93mgkwGbWLOJQCxGHp3qUKoRxHeSwNfxD382GlPUAMD3Wm0OLwMrGZSOEw9rqKgk0jWVVNLffdP4jNV8E+GkWcYA4nIkQm91bFrPpsf92nmHkp8aCWyeproLgNixI5ZTesOxVuIziV3cAtke7I+6Dw/K73kcJEwkbELMm7TPxODGebqg1LuEprCOowMuJ0FYpJ1LVV+k2q0V1HnUM2o54SX7kdufEI3/Kfv+UTeMe4ttA3J0aMrFoBHaOf69V9Mw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=live.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=XMSGebL4IoRLlmZVpZ3EE2rRRp93I2j3+xb3Tgk0lyA=; b=t6TITJ2WaQh+o1EqRdUJe/+cjH4C1rdIoIfHDohZJv1jRSJ0SRkNBLpMMgR8JPW65tN8UgbiWAYhPXhxW7JkgHHK715v/0tMyaf7GI8iRqdHtmkCL7vrcfEvWIczNWTHl3g5cwar0sHLOY5lO95prKNt4shKw/KxKlMBSybK1edG7vF2xAQZ7VKdBJ2Ch4n4vFDyWEYg7oTD3QPSsJUpHqOR88DtF0fozAp/ys5Yz1ALaVzSovMhTk8RaALWnM84s9NPe1qaEqUXKNG2jMyZhABDcTwMMDMI1tNw938EJf5YWKuTvXHBi9SaAmXH4U7H08ZvpoloTM55DQtKXpq30w== Original-Received: from AM9PR09MB4977.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:304::20) by AM9PR09MB4706.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:283::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4544.13; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 13:56:04 +0000 Original-Received: from AM9PR09MB4977.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c55c:ece5:bed2:a9dc]) by AM9PR09MB4977.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c55c:ece5:bed2:a9dc%9]) with mapi id 15.20.4544.021; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 13:56:04 +0000 In-Reply-To: <45571080-4705-38c8-89a6-a41762cf95c2@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sun, 26 Sep 2021 11:09:50 +0200") X-TMN: [v/4GfPPF/uA+MItbXE7+xZcbHqxIPhL7] X-ClientProxiedBy: AM7PR03CA0025.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:130::35) To AM9PR09MB4977.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:304::20) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <87v92nfnkc.fsf@live.com> X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Original-Received: from pascal.homepc (81.232.177.30) by AM7PR03CA0025.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:130::35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4544.14 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 13:56:03 +0000 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: b856a3c2-8deb-430b-3579-08d980f5616d X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: AM9PR09MB4706: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: OLnAJGPuRUm6itKfez0YPLPFNh8fVqsZExfHDasBc4sJ0s+33cgTcOi/3vKTSGxvLVINn+Be2p2E1bGkhgV3tSMRKTmUy7gpOnzfFS0XeCUBEh9MI88jzcl8gpakCLtZmh5dmgeDna+GhrMu+mZrHluhfSXRXxo3EWpX1l8d5fjVrHn6cj6o7C3fA8jDCbyDe6M6A3T5pUdoAk0N88DKiGfDQLHGvLIVpGnqzBExg6mE0k3Bf4+0nZOm3/c/xsUacizbQCQRS2JivgaNN1F2r7smQwoqGcSnPEZQGr3U7AdyKnchpGHaUHvvfVJvrHMEdyjEiVMiLKN7c2fZfJ2CN48FPPU3Rqzw+9QyKfjtUfPCHgpl92+/xwTfGUNfhbnA9Gz8C8UF3CI+wlaoKNp1bNGT6C9jZTt1nK2176eAsCfW1dsy0bYkn2DsWPX4QGBM X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: zpzKVdjt+9ciyol7cMohcFiuBenQp3DjXxvIaUcQv4oDbcqHNXqJPCpt9rTUSzHITl9ZAkLVMkMCx71a8vJf+7YjDuw5VPRwKUtpeErafkAhtA/mi8Q83Gf+tiSUl12/LmqSwZn85TbIzuY6eAjwpg== X-OriginatorOrg: sct-15-20-3174-20-msonline-outlook-72e6e.templateTenant X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b856a3c2-8deb-430b-3579-08d980f5616d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM9PR09MB4977.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Sep 2021 13:56:04.3438 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM9PR09MB4706 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:215600 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> Ah, I didn't meant regexes; I meant using display-buffer-alist to tell Emacs to >> re-use *Help* buffer instead of creating new ones. > > Did you mean to re-use the *Help* buffer _window_ instead of creating a > new one? Yes, exactly; I meant the window, sorry the wording, I guess my thoughts were elsewhere. > I think that should be the rule since the *Help* buffer is > more or less unique but I nowhere see it enforced. Generally I agree, I personally prefer one buffer, but I am not sure if it is *the* best chocice to limit users on only one help buffer at a time. I don't think I personally have enough experience to actually decide anything on that matter. For that reason, the way I coded patches I sent in lately regarding help buffer, I work with it as if there was only one *Help* buffer, and relying on Emacs to return last one in case there are *Help<1>*, *Help<2>* etc.