From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Shigeru Fukaya Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13553: 24.3.50; incorrect usage of IS_DIRECTORY_SEP Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 15:56:54 +0900 Message-ID: References: <83libgje5t.fsf@gnu.org> <83d2wrkfpm.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1359269873 3343 80.91.229.3 (27 Jan 2013 06:57:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 06:57:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13553@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 27 07:58:12 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TzMBu-0000Ac-GZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 07:58:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54019 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TzMBc-0001rE-Py for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 01:57:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60129) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TzMBX-0001ox-Kw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 01:57:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TzMBU-0005cG-Pu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 01:57:47 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45505) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TzMBU-0005c5-MG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 01:57:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TzMBl-0001TP-UO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 01:58:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Shigeru Fukaya Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 06:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13553 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13553-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13553.13592698425613 (code B ref 13553); Sun, 27 Jan 2013 06:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13553) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2013 06:57:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50969 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TzMB6-0001SR-9Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 01:57:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.220.44]:46548) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TzMB2-0001SI-Uf for 13553@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 01:57:18 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id hz11so965643pad.3 for <13553@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 22:56:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:in-reply-to:references :message-id; bh=V+JQ8bk+zbpl+XsuKg+I0mIMT0rJDe+qiPOoBZzGKpM=; b=UP6x4mqYlxRqi+GeXXwwU8ZmImO5oHqom1HUt+Dps5GuyBxirrpFyOCJMY9cGUjh7x 3O/DPDLui81aL42FJ5CpMxYNGfYNhqsN5qO7Jsso5HK27rUGvMvMHWbqgsO+sIDQIH7l 7/Aq+aXZK/Envnm7wKlo0R9yTe4vIvJvoZu024sgtmCk0qTUE5LOARhxRyUnA56p/8XD QuqMko4SGVQuD56HThAg67uBvgQ5zRLTTzfhy8HhH+QA03KSELpP6OyGEPB9lTuWp0Lj vXR7Q2Jpa4AuwkKRbInbj2xlq2skGkBPFIV4DOoc0RQOaOp3tedcubkJ30UCQIgbLY9j GVJQ== X-Received: by 10.66.83.136 with SMTP id q8mr26251794pay.83.1359269818077; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 22:56:58 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from gmail.com (115x125x38x6.ap115.ftth.ucom.ne.jp. [115.125.38.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id qm9sm3903408pbc.10.2013.01.26.22.56.55 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 26 Jan 2013 22:56:56 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: HidemaruMail 6.00 (WinNT,601) In-Reply-To: <83d2wrkfpm.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:70365 Archived-At: Built on migw32, and no trouble, thank you (I didn't do coverage tests, sorry). But we must remember, my raise of issue is the incorrect usage of IS_DIRECTORY_SEP. There are still more in fileio.c and more. (I really expect remove the check of '\' from IS_DIRECTORY_SEP, and handle '\' only where it is necessary, and things wolud be better) >> As for coding symbol, not a few Japanese use 'cp932 not 'shift-jis I >> suppose. But we need some notice for users. > >Not sure what you are saying here. Do you think many Japanese Windows >users will set file-name-coding-system to shift_jis, or that most of >them will set it to cp932? > >Normally, users don't customize file-name-coding-system at all, in >which case Emacs will use default-file-name-coding-system, that is >automatically set to cp932, according to the system-wide codepage. Yes, you are right. I mean, maybe, the case of using some remote file system. You can check by yourself their (our?) usage if you like. Some seems still using shift-jis, not cp932. http://www.google.co.jp/search?q=file-name-coding-system+sjis Regards, Shigeru