From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Van L Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20202: EMACS=t Joy and Happiness Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 17:28:31 +1000 Message-ID: References: <87tvqw4w8s.fsf@russet.org.uk> <6443412a-5803-d9c0-1ef3-ece7f49c43e1@cs.ucla.edu> <83sh6g9s5r.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1527233236 16071 195.159.176.226 (25 May 2018 07:27:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 07:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Paul Eggert , emacs-devel@gnu.org, 20202@debbugs.gnu.org, 20484@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 25 09:27:11 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fM780-0003wR-5e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 May 2018 09:27:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42234 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fM7A7-0000UA-3d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 May 2018 03:29:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59364) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fM79s-0000Rc-No for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2018 03:29:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fM79q-00021y-NZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2018 03:29:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39416) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fM79q-00021m-JY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2018 03:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fM79q-00070S-AE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2018 03:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Van L Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 07:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20202 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20202-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20202.152723332326896 (code B ref 20202); Fri, 25 May 2018 07:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20202) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 May 2018 07:28:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47311 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fM79W-0006zk-Mi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2018 03:28:42 -0400 Original-Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:42233) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fM79V-0006zZ-Fy; Fri, 25 May 2018 03:28:41 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 123.243.244.176 Original-Received: from epi.local (123-243-244-176.tpgi.com.au [123.243.244.176]) (Authenticated sender: van@scratch.space) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CDEDC0012; Fri, 25 May 2018 09:28:38 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83sh6g9s5r.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:146537 Archived-At: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> Bash 4.4 came out only in September 2016, and it's too soon to assume >> it. > > I agree, 1.5 years is too soon. I think we need 5 years at least. How about applying the 5-multiplier to 9-month cycles?