From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7296: display-pixel-height not enough Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:03:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83hbg66vt4.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3qt77lj.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288340048 18248 80.91.229.12 (29 Oct 2010 08:14:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:14:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7296@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 29 10:14:06 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PBk68-0006Bv-3Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:14:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43884 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PBk67-0001pv-6e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 04:14:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45373 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PBk5H-0001eq-SM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 04:13:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PBk5F-000370-9X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 04:13:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59165) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PBk5F-000362-4G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 04:13:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PBjsZ-0000aB-Ao; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 04:00:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lennart Borgman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:00:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7296 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7296-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7296.12883391852209 (code B ref 7296); Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:00:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7296) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Oct 2010 07:59:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PBjsH-0000Za-7M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 03:59:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.216.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PBjsF-0000ZV-OE for 7296@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 03:59:44 -0400 Original-Received: by qwb7 with SMTP id 7so2857316qwb.3 for <7296@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 01:03:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=x6J3KEDCUgH4FTrTlf/jQzw0Ft1KAXpUNJMfgCaVxQg=; b=QK9ePdxg9Uc4Kpdq0zy1dx7an3LE4L0fZLZykwxUf0xh7dawnazWe4V7iynyPiBAor n0TyNfMaidkkygw9cHuFe3D8Z+V30PxJrrknUnd6ilF9/bmGmPZWRvUbHsOy6qL15Qxu WRl+ThZ1n6HDmxucah2LcutQh4ltIrq9T5m9E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=bcPsswXZ9ULXezmmBC7RPGv/7wRPo0tfHrsGzvc6ABUsrATYCNa3a01AZKWvjM5m9+ aH4uesXQDgVAlUVcGLUMGlz2XpElEJlfVAk36Hcuajr9zKT6cH0qoN8DOPO6P9PRUuJ/ /2WCZXSi2C+e1cxQaP+73j/T9IYcwFD5zvmkE= Original-Received: by 10.229.249.138 with SMTP id mk10mr6597406qcb.137.1288339434626; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 01:03:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.229.224.199 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 01:03:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83d3qt77lj.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 04:00:03 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41215 Archived-At: On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Lennart Borgman >> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:39:35 +0200 >> Cc: 7296@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> > Wouldn't it make more sense for display-pixel-height/width to return >> > the height available for display? >> >> Probably. But there are perhaps also situation when you actually want >> to get the dimension of the whole display. Perhaps not at the moment, >> but with enhanced frame handling there could be. > > What use-case could possibly want to know the dimensions that include > unusable portion? What do you mean? When someone wants to use the available height or width. Is not that enough?