From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dani Moncayo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7534: what about committing the patch also to emacs-23? Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:39:49 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296837476 30648 80.91.229.12 (4 Feb 2011 16:37:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:37:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , 7534@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 04 17:37:48 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PlOfF-00048C-6S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:37:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48102 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PlOSS-0004s8-5W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:24:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38091 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PlOAR-0006KO-Sn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:05:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PlOAQ-0003Xr-UB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:05:51 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55477) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PlOAQ-0003Xm-Ob for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:05:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PlNdi-0006hO-8W; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:32:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dani Moncayo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7534 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7534-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7534.129683348025697 (code B ref 7534); Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:32:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7534) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2011 15:31:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PlNd1-0006gQ-UD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:31:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yi0-f44.google.com ([209.85.218.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PlNd0-0006gE-T5 for 7534@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:31:19 -0500 Original-Received: by yie19 with SMTP id 19so1072584yie.3 for <7534@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 07:39:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Xb69zn6iLIrxrT49/QJHcrZi/M8nL6DnJ388G2IX2V4=; b=EpeZh+sIWvy6STNrawJzkO6n2Davkn3zOl4eBEyRgLXwytfPlBjZ3fjwuiwfz6FXEK 3L9sruvJ44WbAqDmTR2uPNLhRdFlsgq3WHWbVMn0u+GDegXH/0xdgwI4FSpexo+1ePL4 1TQ8dZnblJFr7H1sAcAXXBfT3BUvlu8lujQhk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=gaZRcJms9NdCrfNOCzIQ7HPcFlCFrk4NzBt4liPdLiijir1DX65DPQLmCJnLiLTxCj inr9A1s3DkYy4MrrTytOEy5Y32dWFrXMa5KnF3R7Z3FQ68HSYf2o9VSKzNKmeTzTAJYG QL/hv4eOY5q8gKfNK5GrzG7S+GzQMYh4vaR/g= Original-Received: by 10.90.1.15 with SMTP id 15mr15532166aga.148.1296833989799; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 07:39:49 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.91.152.14 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 07:39:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:32:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43935 Archived-At: On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 15:40, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Given that the patch for this bug was tiny and inoffensive, what do >> you think about commiting it also in the emacs-23 branch (before the >> 23.3 release)? > > We expect to be able to ship 23.3 *real soon now*, so we only want to > commit there fixes for regressions now. > mmm... so I've arrived a bit late. It is a pity, because IMO emacs 23.3 would be a little bit better with that bug fixed, but I understand you. Thanks anyway. -- Dani Moncayo