From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: MON KEY Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6241: Please make buffer-offer-save permanent local Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 00:38:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275022666 25815 80.91.229.12 (28 May 2010 04:57:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 04:57:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , 6241@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 28 06:57:44 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHrda-0002sG-8z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 06:57:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38094 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHrdZ-0004vR-N5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 00:57:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35588 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHrdR-0004uO-8Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 00:57:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHrdP-0005A0-CF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 00:57:29 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48885) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHrdP-00059w-Ao for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 00:57:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHrLZ-0002Ix-Qs; Fri, 28 May 2010 00:39:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: MON KEY Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 04:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6241 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6241-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6241.12750214898850 (code B ref 6241); Fri, 28 May 2010 04:39:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6241) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2010 04:38:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHrKj-0002Ih-9t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 00:38:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com ([74.125.83.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHrKh-0002IP-7z for 6241@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 00:38:08 -0400 Original-Received: by gwj19 with SMTP id 19so577001gwj.3 for <6241@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 27 May 2010 21:38:03 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.150.100.14 with SMTP id x14mr1033336ybb.365.1275021483495; Thu, 27 May 2010 21:38:03 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.151.143.21 with HTTP; Thu, 27 May 2010 21:38:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: pfdrNKf9qz-lt8XTU3EANh-4GQM X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 00:39:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:37356 Archived-At: On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: > Not sure what you mean by "tramp'd buffers", but AFAICT such buffers > would most likely be file-buffers and are hence unaffected. howsabout for example comint when tramp'd? > > So, now that the question of "should it ideally be permanent-local?" is > resolved, the remaining question is: "what would be the impact of such Resolved... WTF? > a change", which requires examining all uses of the variable and > assessing the effect of the change for each case. This is ridiculous, please poll whatever this proposed change is becoming on emacs-devel before proceeding w/ this line of reasoning. This is the wrong way to draw a conclusion esp. in lieu of a bug report that was initially one sentence in length. Its not even a bug!!! > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Stefan -- /s_P\