From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: MON KEY Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6241: Please make buffer-offer-save permanent local Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 00:48:10 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275022665 25812 80.91.229.12 (28 May 2010 04:57:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 04:57:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6241@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 28 06:57:43 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHrda-0002ry-0K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 06:57:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38093 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHrdZ-0004vG-5R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 00:57:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35582 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHrdQ-0004tR-3R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 00:57:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHrdP-00059s-37 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 00:57:27 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48883) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHrdP-00059g-0l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 00:57:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHrVG-0002NE-6E; Fri, 28 May 2010 00:49:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: MON KEY Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 04:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6241 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6241-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6241.12750220969111 (code B ref 6241); Fri, 28 May 2010 04:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6241) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2010 04:48:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHrUW-0002Mu-Gd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 00:48:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com ([209.85.160.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHrUV-0002Mp-Hh for 6241@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 00:48:15 -0400 Original-Received: by gyh4 with SMTP id 4so572383gyh.3 for <6241@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 27 May 2010 21:48:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.150.239.10 with SMTP id m10mr1042673ybh.315.1275022090932; Thu, 27 May 2010 21:48:10 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.151.143.21 with HTTP; Thu, 27 May 2010 21:48:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3qdVYso0IZQgDQf1kaBIlkizCss X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 00:49:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:37355 Archived-At: On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Lennart Borgman wrote: > > Please explain more exactly in what situations and why you think they > want to kill `buffer-offer-save'. If you do that we can fix such > cases. I can't think of any myself at the moment. > This is wrong. It is your request, you should be explaining on emacs-devel the exact reason, rationale and use case intended for why this change is needed. > Same question as above. Exactly when and why? Indeed. What are the specific situations this change will remedy. What is the current practice for dealing with them. What is lost if the proposed change doesn't occur. These are the things you should be asking in a more public forum. -- /s_P\