From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7296: display-pixel-height not enough Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 21:27:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83hbg66vt4.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3qt77lj.fsf@gnu.org> <4CCA9E5D.5060002@swipnet.se> <838w1h6zbp.fsf@gnu.org> <4CCAC90B.4070800@swipnet.se> <4CCAFC1A.7060505@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288381935 16668 80.91.229.12 (29 Oct 2010 19:52:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:52:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7296@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 29 21:52:13 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PBuzh-0004Ri-SV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 21:52:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60395 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PBuzh-0006Xz-7R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:52:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56328 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PBuz9-0006BY-4d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:51:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PBur3-0005nP-Hz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:43:14 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60958) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PBur3-0005n5-GR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:43:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PBugD-00062h-Kk; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:32:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lennart Borgman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7296 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7296-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7296.128838071223221 (code B ref 7296); Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:32:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7296) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Oct 2010 19:31:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PBug3-00062U-85 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:31:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com ([209.85.216.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PBug1-00062N-Kp for 7296@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:31:49 -0400 Original-Received: by qyk1 with SMTP id 1so6662869qyk.3 for <7296@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:36:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zYOByKvqebN3CM4VI/4CwT9nRuLWT5ji2HzdpfGF8F0=; b=FrL5EPU1FjIU3/2//aNFz/fiaTfuOlpmMptzx/oyVYvkpl28bxGfpIh1cPfErGmh/W /XW6i0zsQY8gvYOKs7H9zzX/fCvS9QkbHWmTEtXZwB09js2Xh/Mm6pxgyZO2R0KRCwrb GxjkyWSdsLzK1S6nG+ESh7+XlyXmFp5Kb+gwk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=F2mdkANEhFRblUVdeck5bxbQxTyK2odHLCShqEneP8p1Tjy2pxLQeO+lr8UHJU4Wlc m9/2s3BLCq+Zg3M3J7LEvwtdlrh/pJVj38aYX94kA6cCeHs+VvVdBFt+8qpfAcOel9iO 93wGX2Wra7bi6dWzkrK91v4KEaSBvSUzz8uv0= Original-Received: by 10.229.109.197 with SMTP id k5mr2641677qcp.14.1288380961779; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:36:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.229.224.199 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:27:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:32:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41245 Archived-At: On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> Yes, but a w32 frame can be taller than a maximized window, but if the >>> taskbar is always on top, then part of it will be hidden behind the >>> taskbar. That is why I sent this bug report. >> So Emacs must know if the taskbar is configured to always be on top also= ? >> Or does the API functions take that into account. =C2=A0How about taskba= rs >> that autohide? > > I suspect that once we find the way to get the relevant data (probably > it's somewhere in an X display property or something), we'll see that > this question is irrelevant (i.e. already solved by the window-manager). I provided the recipe for w32 in this thread, but I do not know anything about X.