From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 20:56:51 +0200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=001636c5c01149a85e04889d7937 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276111707 14281 80.91.229.12 (9 Jun 2010 19:28:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 19:28:27 +0000 (UTC) To: 6385@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 09 21:28:23 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMQwn-0000Df-6v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 21:28:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37547 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OMQwm-0005cJ-Jg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:28:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59174 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OMQwh-0005cD-2I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:28:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMQwe-0004Pj-MI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:28:14 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51402) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMQwe-0004Pb-Kl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:28:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMQaE-00034E-88; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lennart Borgman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 19:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 6385 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: Emacs Bugs Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.127611024511774 (code B ref -1); Wed, 09 Jun 2010 19:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2010 19:04:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMQZI-00033r-Oy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:04:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMQYF-000339-B5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:04:03 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:57758) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OMQY4-0006cT-2l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:02:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52189 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OMQXy-0007tG-MS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:02:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMQXe-0006ta-8q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:02:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-f187.google.com ([209.85.211.187]:43045) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMQXe-0006tR-1d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:02:22 -0400 Original-Received: by ywh17 with SMTP id 17so1330526ywh.1 for ; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:02:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=cNYg/gvBs38agYKCxW7DZlvUcMkH5G7eUpztxgVzzIs=; b=CEnh+3ajv4x9xgObt7Qw3QZWJorw8Vkr7suY1E32MYp0Q88RlR26sOIKCK16bCaCuz E0+Rvb5XS30jsjH9JnR15l4865GnO67rZbTaiyPenVOhwwjjrJDsZTW2egod/cpU950+ uID1whdBtHWR9JE+SPs7FGYlF/N3g/W8AQfZg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=fQh0sw0a7qdO1E2Ti63kBqQe/3BWxBHo/TYlZwLSTvmq0NpU5R/QHEOKuizuJLXJOx Z1WgwTwSNaJMQVx60uS7iBHwV8I4fvzS8p+JTIT8a1OK1fmuhZiPcmjUp53TyMOcj8sE lrvYJreldSfkiFR6avgzXVKQHLGPURlqpQqeI= Original-Received: by 10.101.5.40 with SMTP id h40mr2567827ani.133.1276109832955; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 11:57:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.100.154.15 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 11:56:51 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:05:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:37636 Archived-At: --001636c5c01149a85e04889d7937 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I believe fit-window-to-buffer has become a bit upset and unnecessary aggressive because of visual lines. It looks like it need a bit more feedback from the display system to be really sure that the buffer is entirely visible. The attached patch is something I have used to get around the problem. I am not sure it is the right thing but I am rather sure it does not hurt. Too see the problem it tries to fix just call the function with a buffer larger than window and point below the window bottom (you have to write a bit elisp code for that). Of course we need a non-killing version of fit-window-to-buffer, but for the moment this patch might be useful. --001636c5c01149a85e04889d7937 Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=US-ASCII; name="windows-less-aggressive-fit-1.diff" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="windows-less-aggressive-fit-1.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_ga8is68f0 PT09IG1vZGlmaWVkIGZpbGUgJ2xpc3Avd2luZG93LmVsJw0KLS0tIHRydW5rL2xpc3Avd2luZG93 LmVsCTIwMTAtMDYtMDcgMTg6Mjg6MDIgKzAwMDANCisrKyBwYXRjaGVkL2xpc3Avd2luZG93LmVs CTIwMTAtMDYtMDkgMTg6NDg6MzcgKzAwMDANCkBAIC0xNTAyLDEwICsxNTAyLDEyIEBADQogCQkJ ICAgICAoZm9yd2FyZC1saW5lIDApKQ0KIAkJCSAgIChwb2ludCkpKSkNCiAJCShzZXQtd2luZG93 LXZzY3JvbGwgd2luZG93IDApDQorICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIChyZWRpc3BsYXkgdCkNCiAJCSh3 aGlsZSAoYW5kICg8IGRlc2lyZWQtaGVpZ2h0IG1heC1oZWlnaHQpDQogCQkJICAgICg9IGRlc2ly ZWQtaGVpZ2h0ICh3aW5kb3ctaGVpZ2h0KSkNCiAJCQkgICAgKG5vdCAocG9zLXZpc2libGUtaW4t d2luZG93LXAgZW5kKSkpDQogCQkgIChlbmxhcmdlLXdpbmRvdyAxKQ0KKyAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgIChyZWRpc3BsYXkgdCkNCiAJCSAgKHNldHEgZGVzaXJlZC1oZWlnaHQgKDErIGRlc2lyZWQt aGVpZ2h0KSkpKQ0KIAkgICAgICA7OyBSZXR1cm4gbm9uLW5pbCBvbmx5IGlmIG5vdGhpbmcgImJh ZCIgaGFwcGVuZWQuDQogCSAgICAgIChzZXRxIHZhbHVlIHQpKSkNCg0K --001636c5c01149a85e04889d7937--