From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8334: Segmentation fault in mark_object (in my patched version) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 01:52:24 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87ei5xs5q0.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300928838 20574 80.91.229.12 (24 Mar 2011 01:07:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 01:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8334@debbugs.gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 24 02:07:13 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2Z17-0000az-5n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 02:07:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59383 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q2Z16-0005dG-Fs for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:07:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40305 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q2Z10-0005d1-PD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:07:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2Z0z-0007t1-SI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:07:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49660) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2Z0z-0007sw-PR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:07:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2YnO-0004qs-Dg; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:53:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lennart Borgman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8334 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8334-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8334.130092797218635 (code B ref 8334); Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8334) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Mar 2011 00:52:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2YnD-0004qV-Jl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:52:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com ([209.85.215.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2YnC-0004qH-1s for 8334@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:52:50 -0400 Original-Received: by eye13 with SMTP id 13so2295512eye.3 for <8334@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:52:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OvEKz9irAjQvMxHEaWySaEl+3BXQNDlmQ/ujz+PjvGA=; b=sIY7dzWOLyFxe9JxsDSIENJ3PYxEmyMUQHhu0X3SA333ghtNP+moDYP6XwehAk8AjB 4/dnLemOryG/ZHfCdiKBhz39jexPenzbUM9N+kvjBmyJIFGUOkC5uebQgQs6Wu5O7IGj YNGHt+3CqFQ42ALNvYT1qlFE6K7vpJKEmXvDY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=t/PUxJckaaJUTs4zxhAbhCnzTyFat4xC82J9jrdn4mYRAJfhHIGva7YlSTKL7VDWpT G4WcjDQqqRWenAdGoCD2btQR1wPo4JwTaUUs1HuIs1BvaIc1p/ufO1QEXjgr6wb8Br3y xRhq/+ZdkzevqwZP+jOYPy3LfPZGPAaYoYLBw= Original-Received: by 10.213.13.194 with SMTP id d2mr3282982eba.134.1300927964250; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:52:44 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.213.22.6 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:52:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ei5xs5q0.fsf@stupidchicken.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:53:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:45297 Archived-At: On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Chong Yidong wrote= : > Lennart Borgman writes: > >> I just got a segmentation fault in mark_object. This was with my >> patched version: > > No test case supplied; bug occurs on a tree with unspecified > modifications. =C2=A0Tagging as unreproducible. Of course there is no test case for this. I have not idea what caused it (except from the info in the backtrace). But what is the advantage and meaning of tagging it as "unreproducible"?