From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6950: Invisible parts and editing - reveal them? Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:28:51 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283341196 13432 80.91.229.12 (1 Sep 2010 11:39:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 11:39:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6950@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 01 13:39:55 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqlfW-0007lB-E3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:39:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37501 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OqlfV-0007lg-LJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:39:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44649 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OqlfO-0007lI-HE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:39:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqlfN-0006e7-3W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:39:46 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46396) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqlfN-0006e1-0t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:39:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqlU2-0000W8-8u; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lennart Borgman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 11:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6950 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6950-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6950.12833404541982 (code B ref 6950); Wed, 01 Sep 2010 11:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6950) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2010 11:27:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqlTZ-0000Vv-Kq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:27:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com ([209.85.216.179]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqlTX-0000Vq-7w for 6950@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:27:31 -0400 Original-Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so7718601qyk.3 for <6950@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 04:29:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=KUdC+PJ0/D5eFnkxGsHPC0bpLssCu8SK9KOlL8z4Diw=; b=gmwr2CZkaaYD2eCf78qMJ3UJu7v6+IHgDErp92vi4mbCcKjmVxl3WOUIaZASnNv8O1 CX/5nisHsjKfJ6kC9W3QqlaR//Mnrmh286tAqP2ykN59S95w6+Yh9cQ00S//z4+9/3JC hbhmIE+sJilBASLihbXw6H08EN6bpPORLkgTg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=mja8/4KpqjuxZtYNOfG+V++YMZqqzDnsMGyYYJ+PXnfw1QS5eYd++hkEf1/6AbtKKx DY/kl2LrHg0M6u5aYuyU3QCUc3eGkNx+2ZyaOmJVS0tGg1vlfxMabgg/GgVLAwu9RpLG rN+Rl9zYLn4l4ttEN9b5/2ga2xuVgRuiqFOJs= Original-Received: by 10.224.69.17 with SMTP id x17mr4983616qai.283.1283340551304; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 04:29:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.229.20.139 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 04:28:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:28:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:39881 Archived-At: On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> However when you edit such parts they normally do not get visible even >> if reveal-mode is on. > > reveal-mode should unhide the text, assuming that point is within it. Eh, sorry, you are right. reveal-mode takes care of this. I thought I had it on, but for some reason I had commented it out. I think I got confused by the similar mechanism in isearch that is on by default. That it is on by default seems good. What is the reason reveal-mode is not on by default? (I have a feeling there was some small problem, but I can't remember now.)