From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=90=D0=BD=D0=B4=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=B9_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=BC=D0=BE=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7368: Testcase Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:19:50 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87y690q1qa.fsf@neo.paramonovs> <4CDE4D2D.2000304@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1289940270 16699 80.91.229.12 (16 Nov 2010 20:44:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7368@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 16 21:44:26 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PISO8-000875-19 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:44:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40322 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PISO7-00040w-JV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:44:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58879 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PISO0-000402-Qg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:44:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PISNz-00075q-EH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:44:16 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52940) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PISNz-00075l-C9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:44:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PIRwg-0007hb-8e; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:16:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=90=D0=BD=D0=B4=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=B9_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=BC=D0=BE=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7368 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7368-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7368.128993853229592 (code B ref 7368); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7368) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Nov 2010 20:15:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PIRwC-0007hF-Lf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:15:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com ([74.125.83.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PIRwB-0007hA-5L for 7368@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:15:31 -0500 Original-Received: by gwb10 with SMTP id 10so723534gwb.3 for <7368@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:20:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=zixwijzHNC2TsnnG+mggm5gu5cTPZ0ACNWddI+TIaa0=; b=jwcJwYw+o0auFZO4LWLfBM5ObEVampJ8vW8O43a2q7Kui0QlmBIn2K3PsIHLvfR+xN 6icv+ypUZ8gXeO5x2CQTkP0kKbU6iUMRm0S8jaKMZ70mVqbl8B5yzJh802YLOiJ6gihQ tk9VyI8/FhVqhhAjSNfdpVgD003w/Z7q5GKzE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=NZ2iHyUjQIJ3AqWge65DU+d2FedEym7vaJc/iNlYpLIYPPKuCsBtZ9ew9PBahH2QUP HpVEzBzWnm8oH8N4G10/5qEt5CE4wzRCUq88DfNfPGGLSr4DFX3OnTA4QZNGKANiXFs4 gksqWc5nPri7cW5kcXWsH8+0z4beQeqn3oRW8= Original-Received: by 10.204.102.141 with SMTP id g13mr8036519bko.74.1289938830379; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:20:30 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.204.49.208 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:19:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:16:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41672 Archived-At: 2010/11/16 Stefan Monnier : > It's actually soft-dedicated (i.e. dedicated but switch-to-buffer can > override it). After another debug session I see that there are 2 types of special windows: 1) A "softly dedicated" window is a window with 2 properties: a) it is tied to a certain buffer, and when that buffer is destroyed the window is destroyed too; b) it cannot be target of display-buffer. 2) A "truly dedicated" window is a window with 3 properties: a) it is tied to a certain buffer, and when that buffer is destroyed the window is destroyed too; b) it cannot be target of display-buffer; c) it cannot be target of switch-to-buffer. Wouldn't it be more logical to have the following? 1) A "softly dedicated" window is a window tied to a certain buffer, and when that buffer is destroyed the window is destroyed too. 2) A "truly dedicated" window is a "softly dedicated" window which cannot be target of neither display-buffer nor switch-to-buffer. That would solve the problem, but I'm beginning to doubt if it's worth it to solve the problem generally... Best wishes, Andrey Paramonov