From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7951: Duplicate of #4970? Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 03:29:41 -0400 Message-ID: <9fvcs5nriy.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <4D4707DD.5010306@yieldbuild.com> <1317713027.21893.140258150748761@webmail.messagingengine.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317713446 13793 80.91.229.12 (4 Oct 2011 07:30:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 07:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7951@debbugs.gnu.org To: "era eriksson" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 04 09:30:42 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RAzSb-0001MV-Fm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 09:30:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56309 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RAzSa-00065P-CE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 03:30:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58505) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RAzSX-000659-4M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 03:30:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RAzSW-0005H4-6D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 03:30:37 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38066) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RAzSW-0005H0-4i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 03:30:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RAzTu-0005cb-Dv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 03:32:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 07:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7951 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7951-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7951.131771347621549 (code B ref 7951); Tue, 04 Oct 2011 07:32:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7951) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Oct 2011 07:31:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RAzT8-0005bU-It for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 03:31:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RAzT5-0005bM-39 for 7951@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 03:31:13 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RAzRd-00033Q-LH; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 03:29:41 -0400 X-Spook: sniper Leitrim wire transfer espionage BCCI Gazprom X-Ran: ^Zg$/tX;9O1^WZkb;a^?c.=,-20Cor@'s]N@3Mu&6A).bTW^D}:$l{+g9fm:uTJyP`976j X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <1317713027.21893.140258150748761@webmail.messagingengine.com> (era eriksson's message of "Tue, 04 Oct 2011 10:23:47 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 03:32:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52148 Archived-At: "era eriksson" wrote: > Is this bug a duplicate of #4970? Well, that one was fixed in Emacs 23.2, so I repeat my suggestion to try 23.2 (preferably 23.3 now).